Re: [Teas] IPR Disclosure Infinera Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 02 February 2016 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06F01B2D61; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:58:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1_iVGIOSaMG; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC071B2D31; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:58:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u12GwYAg028679; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:58:34 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (genkt-051-249.t-mobile.co.uk [149.254.51.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u12GwWqn028639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:58:33 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
References: <20160202023242.18090.31943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160202023242.18090.31943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:58:32 -0000
Message-ID: <080501d15dda$f37f3970$da7dac50$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE9YWcnSvmVf4/tKpVCphxHeZu1gKBA7Ejw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22108.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.457-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.457-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 8+bhjh9TQnEwJ6xbTjBa5hes/RxhysDbHQ+zIynnQ44wp/4s3hUlGFFF U1+kMyB9nK6NH0kJeVoWDiZuNZ5GFEZNovQjOho64RtSDjG+z7At0t+aIVLt+2mJ+7V5rRcziO9 fzG806wv2CA6nCFuMOI79apvZZOBwB4uNgLBEIwK5YHZkCjBFPcyZqgcnwGktut/GVGOoEncsk8 +mp2IupqISlj6EA9QBS7jWhMPv8kdbRbA/K/rHzMzWN98iBBeGix+K88kLVD3szSHnsvb4wViqA yk7LkbkxgY9KEtVbV+6FiTSuaSOn2e90Z2gWyxa5DSMPEZQAkPqecjpIr2SF1oFVE3QkZylU9a6 zfLFA1YRnrkKGK4/PF+24nCsUSFNt7DW3B48kkHdB/CxWTRRu25FeHtsUoHu7RrAXtTfMaH0JSH b/u5fvENsLC8sQKdpnCH7sJDPUFXFhXMjdQIJpg==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/X42snXb0Fi-MwW2UUhS1sIrGJJY>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] IPR Disclosure Infinera Corporation's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:58:39 -0000

I'm always pleased to see IPR disclosed before last call even when the disclosure is painfully late.

In this case Rajan is named as a co-inventor on the patent application (which I see at http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20140156751.pdf). This patent application is dated June 5, 2014.

Rajan first became listed as a Contributor to draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange in revision -06 posted on July 25, 2014.

I may be a harsh judge, but this disclosure doesn't seem to me to have been made "as soon as reasonably possible."

That said, the cited patent application appears to describe a mechanism for backwards recursive path computation using RSVP-TE signaling (which is akin to a hybrid of RFC 5441 and RFC 4920). Such a mechanism is not proposed or even mentioned in this document, so readers may draw their own conclusions about the relevance of the disclosure.

Lastly, I note that the license terms disclosed appear to follow the "mutually assured destruction" terms commonly offered by IETF participants.

I do not propose any changes to this document resulting from this disclosure.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org]
> Sent: 02 February 2016 02:33
> To: draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange@ietf.org
> Cc: ipr-announce@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org
> Subject: IPR Disclosure Infinera Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
> 
> Dear Adrian Farrel, John Drake, Dr. Nabil N. Bitar, George Swallow, Daniele
> Ceccarelli, Xian Zhang:
> 
> 
> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "Problem
> Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected
> Traffic Engineered Networks"
> (draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange) was submitted to the IETF
> Secretariat on  and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property
> Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2745/). The title of the
> IPR disclosure is "Infinera Corporation's Statement about IPR related to
> draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange"
> 
> 
> Thank you
> 
> IETF Secretariat