[Teas] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

[Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this whole idea is based on the fact that you can actually have
multiple different prefix the traffic based on the network treatment it should
have. I think that has very limited applicability unless we are talking a
deployment where one target tunnels between in ingress and egress that does
traffic classification based on other aspects. Can this assumption about that
the IP traffic needs to use different IP addresses with different prefix to get
any differential treatment be expanded in the discussion?