[Teas] Re: AD review for draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing

daniel@olddog.co.uk Thu, 25 July 2024 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7DCC14F726 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hy_gjJhOkaWh for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79336C1F6F9F for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-7a23fbb372dso105756a12.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1721928936; x=1722533736; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=BRQ+Hgay2fjRHfZmPIqdCawshuxRs4b4rBzHJPYA+e4=; b=OW+t9xbiaUesCMLj5ZGUzD0kUOi6oVQ4IHva1MlGMfv0kENTwEyW+hlIJ2lyNzfwQa L3EMxJYaHIHD6d2OBys7SPCeKi4pFjrCKwpgZUVxX9RBzo42WApfueInTM5P2StzRRJ0 36dpP0jyAl29Us0LnlrhcScgNqb9jg6y8yf0XIjhlJhVRzgzjGMvSukzNxWJ8Rv3CYW9 3bV/n/qkNQvhUxXDSeBKYRUAv1zGsP2qkzvsPwTQOmrYWCwVsL8VBbqn+PJSE8BwobrV 5t3RCpo7zXnk7YEUxoQFJeo6kuXVwxZGlnoo0ezS0YRlOM430v4WbAUUTVZ7UdwkLsKD WQfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721928936; x=1722533736; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BRQ+Hgay2fjRHfZmPIqdCawshuxRs4b4rBzHJPYA+e4=; b=kva9uITm3j4iweSQ++1yfC74oMwDdtn3EFlnyWLsmUtAFhlqj5uDvsKUPr76iZEzSK FuR/kSpundvfmorwJ4e7LNZDBuKBF6KVcWDlQ2E56RzbjtUevxX+gyLZchLH80qXgyQf mKPZNXlXxQ7OHT52oll5RZGvF30UjY8bM5DctGAkAlVPoHDzg6863RdavhGEjmjIIqW2 7Tc5ku1mCuTIp3O2c0oDspSTxydp0So/qQ9lXztPD0eIslaNt2PWR+A8qrk0sEfM9aVJ Gd4oDLLEblzXEW1OXe+W/mhKbazqK7FVeOpiwrxKODNVvai95+B0YNvkVHTSTlWxSpJN mnfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyKdUPG3ViylLAd69JX/J396RSV/rcOGGSO2HocTdW/iXCYOdtD ++vfwc4FCLnK9Vi7rzkQICNaJxuJwoNKGUTrY+FjhCTbbxuecSHITGJ6b6J7FQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFnHJsFtq8Dq+N1fxx0wDL7zYKtz66r6GWev6tY3TcsKsmDXfGGDrzng3RY7n2yPD9TKduMTA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a81:b0:2c8:946f:5fe7 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cf237b7c93mr4433800a91.17.1721928935987; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Trinity ([2001:67c:370:128:a1f3:7c9d:addd:1719]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cf28dfb687sm1781558a91.38.2024.07.25.10.35.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: 'James Guichard' <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
References: <MW5PR13MB548531DA067EB77CE36C7E85D2A82@MW5PR13MB5485.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW5PR13MB548531DA067EB77CE36C7E85D2A82@MW5PR13MB5485.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:35:35 -0700
Message-ID: <01ec01dadeb9$0ee86c00$2cb94400$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01ED_01DADE7E.628B1AA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFgFJwHOLrydkWP4O/7eGoBB+v/RLL9SBJg
Content-Language: en-gb
Message-ID-Hash: LIOZ2A5YREANOFU3LXWLI4SE3LZIRA4G
X-Message-ID-Hash: LIOZ2A5YREANOFU3LXWLI4SE3LZIRA4G
X-MailFrom: dk@danielking.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: teas@ietf.org, draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Re: AD review for draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/YPz_ZXTGdistLM7jzEXK2Q2C5PY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

Dear Jim,

 

Thanks for the review, comments, and suggested updates. All gratefully
received and addressed in the latest version. 

 

The new (07) version was just uploaded.

 

BR, Dan (on behalf of the authors)

 

From: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 5:34 AM
To: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: AD review for draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing

 

Dear authors,

 

Thank you for a nicely written document. Please consider the following
comments (I have used line numbers from idnits to help identify where in the
document the comment applies):

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of

     draft-dhody-teas-ietf-network-slice-mapping-04

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-26) exists of

     draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang-25

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-29) exists of

     draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-24

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-20) exists of

     draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-17

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-13) exists of

     draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-10

 

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of

     draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability-04

 

138     At one end of the spectrum, a virtual private wire or a Virtual

 

Jim> s/virtual private wire/Virtual Private Wire (VPW)

 

174     Section 3, "Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered (TE)

175     Networks (ACTN)", this document highlights how the ACTN approach

 

Jim> Section 3 has a longer description so either remove the section title
above or correct it. Personally, I would just say Section 3 and remove the
title text.

 

338     *  Physical forwarding plane sources, such as wavelengths and time

339         slots.

 

Jim> s/sources/resources (?)

 

386   3.2.  ACTN Virtual Network for and Scaling Network Slices

 

Jim> Please correct the above title. Is it 'for' scaling network slices or
'and'

 

450     Note 2 - The MDSC-to-MDSC Interface (XMI) is an interface between
two

451     MDSC functional elements encompassing different MDSC service-related

452     functions which is not defined in [RFC8453].

 

Jim> is it MDSC-to-MDSC or Service Orchestrator-to-MDSC interface? From
figure 1 it looks like the latter (?) - please clarify.

 

673     The TE-service mapping model [I-D.ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang]

674     creates a binding relationship across a L2VPN Service Model (L3SM)

 

Jim> s/L2VPN Service Model/L3VPN Service Model - RFC 8299 is for L3SM not
L2SM.

 

Thanks!

 

Jim