IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-06

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 28 October 2017 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F2F13F678; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4ynbomAMgmC; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EAF13F675; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id r64so10679019qkc.1; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nBgBvl1Gr+2DoVCzxK/qQ8nVUBffCqhAn6Qqj1smNGg=; b=tkTSTKU1zUkj4uQrybSr9DAsZbUo7kI2U2KGcTv6AqdIYVwA9ugF2e+qF28hYHx8wX 0as1MmROoLTOSL61A0mP7NV6G+jq3Tx+o2LxPEh2gnqFhRl6kerWuxdgyITWOxYAamRY V425BlzD3z56AFmh1C8qsY2mtgJZvwOq9DNc/LpdpOXwV6tigoGaC5+qo+7s0vZb2c/i 0mTipKXVJ9SuYXi0C4FURaFoEW2SnXo2BOchG3ByvHh7lPnEhZPTF9IT2AwzpygsjxZP feBCPYp1EuE9Vt/4lcJnzYzoE9b92Bic/v/deyp2vYJq7XtiIm6mCtK+9DtkVt4wKD/+ FUow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nBgBvl1Gr+2DoVCzxK/qQ8nVUBffCqhAn6Qqj1smNGg=; b=creKCCLRvbitCJr6/jjduChiCsTHhxTLCZZG8zCdgc0hhZ1z5fIwptpnudnRsafJDU Elz28L5QpXBecV0G68uXgnnbgYx2+bvIhwXflmbiYJaCFpoHpSxDXNp3IWHfFvgWBZ90 OABLnKp4AtpxYg+rQ/oOY7f+m4zMVbZB1431xSEFMiPF2w9zzqi2yX/F2pL0d1rzHv1i amaXazPA5BKNn8EY/cjB8e1d+ZD3LoBSKWttYuyb2JTNQjwmTrlv7FvToeaN9MgfZJVo zb0kAlrl4eOus+XWcZr3W9D9PaphDlFUCFY95c51jXeGQhN01xrL9TFsDsT35jrhfT0Y BDiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVPjNV+lGNmIpvhETCSk8Iya8Kt1fhCPCbyLKDrPDzXGMKDL2qC MzcrefWmhg1RiDzEZ6dby7QebcIc9X96n7Ju75c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+ReGAt0Dp//loEyBmVMdvFxD2yFzCEghee7r7d8aED6DOmQfIMHWjhBaMcNnDL7OYPQejxADK/OepwnnQNKLgQ=
X-Received: by 10.55.18.28 with SMTP id c28mr3976130qkh.297.1509166670386; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.86.17 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTtBNK8xFzXpH+bx+UesCXxf3=X0QDphPno+ZEce95PHfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTtBNK8xFzXpH+bx+UesCXxf3=X0QDphPno+ZEce95PHfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:27:49 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5wAQDysAsPzysu9Ym+fgMjVLstxg2aDhi3cVnkRH1UgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, Khuzema Pithewan <kpithewan@infinera.com>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Takuya Miyasaka <ta-miyasaka@kddi.com>, "신종윤(Shin Jongyoon)" <jongyoon.shin@sk.com>, "이광국(Network Innovation Projec)" <kwangkoog.lee@kt.com>, xuyunbin@mail.ritt.com.cn, toshiaki.suzuki.cs@hitachi.com, Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114750104b9b7b055c943f14"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/acOmi0NG_dabULOROUvy3c8Kv-0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements-06
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 04:57:53 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Regards,
Dhruv

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email