[Teas] RFC XXXX Thing RE: Review of draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls

[[e-mail]]

Hi Daniele,



Thank you for the review. Much appreciated.



Replying separately to the first comment:



I fully agree with you about the RFC XXXX thing. FWIW, we are just following the outcome of the IESG review of the slicing framework, especially the note from Adrian: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xyY_rSscTbhXcLS-G7C5OCzQ6Z4/



TN Network Slice would be just fine for this draft. We already sent a note to tsvwg with that specific point to warrant why we use "transport" even if we know that this may hurt tsv people, please see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/mMrXmHk02M5NBFwBePXEHD_2Qv4/.



WG guidance is welcome.



Cheers,

Med



De : Teas <[e-mail]> De la part de [e-mail]
Envoyé : vendredi 1 décembre 2023 15:30
À : 'TEAS WG' <[e-mail]>
Objet : [Teas] Review of draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls



Authors, WG,



I reviewed draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls. Please find below some comments:



*       General: This is applicable in general to all the network slicing drafts: I don't really like the usage of "RFC XXXX Network Slice". The term will need to be used both in IETF and mostly outside the IETF, it needs to be more intuitive. I'm happy with TN network slice, IETF network slice, but not RFC XXXX, it doesn't provide context for an external user. The term Transport Network is controversial due to different meaning, but the in the draft is extensively used, then why not using it also to identify the slice? Moreover, if one day the RFC will be obsoleted? We'll need to update the name of the network slices?



Thanks,

Daniele

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.