Re: [Teas] Reply to ETSI communication on WIM

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 14 December 2019 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB38B120018; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DeE9Ju4gRsm; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B2BB1200A1; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id q8so3514896pfh.7; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=IwA/0b4ekJ2uoelg00A2Luw0IUZCdK+P7RBITbRpjPs=; b=Tse9GG4Slu8zRYUbDZD/ab0ZGalkvTVVeS2lCK+PVT4Zw2cjYzlmbcJJiYbYCjH5F1 XS9yWLLz0QudZEep5/BYFMwydLybnR1cud+yuYxLHaZNrpVga57liiO8bu9W+t4pjZTV 1i/CT8fqVWLVcTVFYXW0EoVSwNaPw/2lmo+IF2qqBiREjSSofEezdlhezVly/l1c77Wu 0z1SF/z7tiZ2Y/zFo55hWgkItAhj22Jk4qssQnLquS6fJkUgc0CAPu+ZltG82zDFo6BV XH78rneKDovAi4i8NLa8kliXIQeK+CGCWSWM1xTgtKXgkwosGjcyJyT928Nrs09YNcnW XeDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=IwA/0b4ekJ2uoelg00A2Luw0IUZCdK+P7RBITbRpjPs=; b=jkYI6qi1fvJpb5LEDAK1ZvRCg0oHqEcmu4ji96bcw1foAk/2t+x6YTSWPXK7FhEJOR 4jynWni1kOmOoVcQD/PGVjaw7NsS/6sE5Mkc+3/myI+hAgj74jPodQFk/RRdhQK2Qa0u m9BmHyR1MvtK6PxQM+Y9OO+xNCqUP9mRM0002y5ugLArUDrFnljcLmyd4PtQCl01T7Bd MCC70Uv3x2JzZxGu9UG9EpVGTRXhjxVvz/XITrx2x0neHk69B1tAw8Lu/amufj1gfDTq KJUA9Dz1G8w3S6hodxUqCMRqGltnnLkp7PDxVwcCcXF1onB0TIc2JikUqQg1eVYaUO5y /DJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU/Xlc8AA6UDJEWW7rEjtjDkP+VS5s/8liMWztWqEyXvVlerfF5 rMTD5RZZ0G9/i73ox1l+xLsPuHBm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxPsV0sI1B6pwk+W+7wrEIfgJ+jm/aNs38Yrn5zqYvntyWNlUwAnj71C17/5NpNvPKLuYnApg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:2e07:: with SMTP id u7mr8495859pgu.295.1576366893204; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (47-36-118-16.dhcp.reno.nv.charter.com. [47.36.118.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 129sm16650412pfw.71.2019.12.14.15.41.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-96297A7F-9AAC-4C8E-B70D-E76A3546EC47
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:41:31 -0800
Message-Id: <FA507103-AE28-4474-A624-96EAC21ED470@gmail.com>
References: <AM6PR0702MB36065C7B33DB7E8C1786BEF4F0570@AM6PR0702MB3606.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "opsa@ietf.org" <opsa@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR0702MB36065C7B33DB7E8C1786BEF4F0570@AM6PR0702MB3606.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ayi5VjhnmIHXdfL7rnQZrlVyeME>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Reply to ETSI communication on WIM
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 23:41:37 -0000

Looks good Daniele!

Regards,
Jeff

> On Dec 14, 2019, at 09:27, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> TEAS, CCAMP, chairs,
>  
> I tried to put together a  first draft of the reply to the ETSI communication.
> I would suggest to include the OPSA WG since the reply includes also the service and network models defined there.
> Here is a preliminary proposal:
> -----
> The IETF TEAS and CCAMP working groups would like to thank the ETSI ISG NFV for notifying the start of the work on multi-site connectivity services. We acknowledge the commonalities between the WIM infrastructure manager interfaces and the ACTN ones, in particular the CMI (CSC-MDSC) interface. Our understanding is that the scope of the WIM interfaces is not limited to the management of the underlay Traffic Engineered infrastructure but also the connectivity services that can be built on top of that, like e.g. L3VPNs and L2VPNs.
>  
> The relevant documents specifying YANG models (and related status) for the connectivity services are:
> L3SM – A service model for L3VPN services – RFC 8299
> L2SM – A service model for L2VPN service – RFC 8466
> L1CMS - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang/  stable working group document already reviewed by YANG doctors.
> L3NM – https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/  stable working group document
>  
> On the other side ACTN provides guidelines for the implementation of interfaces for the management of traffic engineered underlay infrastructure (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-yang/). A wide variety of YANG models can be used to implement various features (e.g. calendaring, telemetry) but a minimal set of mandatory models to operate the network is identified:
>  
> TE topology: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo/ – approved by the IESG and in the editor queue
> ACTN virtual network: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang/ – stable working group document
> TE tunnel: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te/ – stable working group document
>  
> Extensions to these models are defined in the CCAMP working group to provide technology specific extensions. TE Topology and TE tunnels augmentations are being defined for WSON (Wavelength Switched Optical Networks), flexi grid WSON, OTN (digital layer of the Optical Transport Network) and microwave.
> In the eventuality in which the ETSI NFV ISG identifies additional requirements that are not currently addressed in the ACTN framework (RFC8453) and models, they can be proposed as individual contributions either in the TEAS working group (if technology agnostic) or in the CCAMP working group (if technology specific) and follow the IETF process.
> ----
> BR
> Daniele 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas