Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-15.txt

[Xufeng Liu <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tom,

Thanks for the review and comments. We have posted
draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-16
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-16>
, trying to resolve these comments. Please let us know for further issues.

Best regards,

- Xufeng

On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:14 AM t petch <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On 05/07/2022 02:40, [e-mail] wrote:
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
> Signaling WG of the IETF.
> >
> >          Title           : YANG Data Model for SR and SR TE Topologies
> on MPLS Data Plane
> >          Authors         : Xufeng Liu
> >                            Igor Bryskin
> >                            Vishnu Pavan Beeram
> >                            Tarek Saad
> >                            Himanshu Shah
> >                            Stephane Litkowski
> >    Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-15.txt
> >    Pages           : 54
> >    Date            : 2022-07-04
>
> The change in layout to conform to YANG guidelines makes this hard to
> compare with predecessors but simpler for me in future so thank you for
> that.
>
> [Xufeng]: Thanks for checking.


> I see RFC8402 and RFC8662 in the YANG module but not in the I-D
> References while ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment.. is now RFC9085 I think.
>
> [Xufeng]: Thanks for pointing them out. Fixed.


> I still struggle with MSD.  It can come from multiple protocols but the
> YANG Reference for base-mpls-msd only lists one; is that a limitation of
> the module or a reflection of what is out there?
>
> erld-msd confused me for a while. I am familiar with erld but not seeing
> it referred to as erld-msd; is that a common form of reference?  I note
> the 'feature msd' would seem to be 'feature msd' or feature erld-msd or
> both. Perhaps worth an explanatory note in 2.6 or 2.7.
>
> [Xufeng]: Have noticed that you have been discussing this issue with the
authors of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang.
Please
let us know if you think that we should do further improvements in this
document, after that conversation.


> Tom Petch
>
> >
> > Abstract:
> >     This document defines a YANG data model for Segment Routing (SR)
> >     topology and Segment Routing (SR) traffic engineering (TE) topology,
> >     using MPLS data plane.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo/
> >
> > There is also an htmlized version available at:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-15
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-yang-sr-te-topo-15
> >
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org:
> :internet-drafts
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Teas mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> > .
> >
>