Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements

"CLAPP, GEORGE H (GEORGE H)" <clapp@research.att.com> Thu, 18 June 2015 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <clapp@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6311B325D for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JNLIh7-3KJaE for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CA01B325E for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-255-15.research.att.com [135.207.255.15]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B69120E60; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:58:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.240.40]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893D2E0246; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90%25]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:37:06 -0400
From: "CLAPP, GEORGE H (GEORGE H)" <clapp@research.att.com>
To: 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>, "bwilson@appcomsci.com" <bwilson@appcomsci.com>, "vishnu.shukla@verizon.com" <vishnu.shukla@verizon.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:37:06 -0400
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements
Thread-Index: AdCpziQKSwP55R32TsCrvDT7194/5gABgvpQ
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D06629DC7AB@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <CA+YzgTuVGLLpYHS32hNk+Yk2faP-EQCshw9nB_BdO8wYOQvF2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTuVGLLpYHS32hNk+Yk2faP-EQCshw9nB_BdO8wYOQvF2w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D06629DC7ABNJFPSRVEXG0re_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/iLjdqomGdNG-J5GdR8PompJPwAs>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:44:20 -0700
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:39:25 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

George

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 4:19 PM
To: Andrew Malis; bwilson@appcomsci.com; CLAPP, GEORGE H (GEORGE H); vishnu.shukla@verizon.com
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-fast-lsps-requirements

Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
- TEAS WG Chairs

PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.