[Teas] Fwd: FW: Directorate Early Reviews

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 17 October 2022 00:21 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM7PR03MB6451605AB56AFC67424797A3EE229@AM7PR03MB6451.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BN8PR05MB6596EBAE628A769E090FF007BE299@BN8PR05MB6596.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN8PR05MB6596EBAE628A769E090FF007BE299@BN8PR05MB6596.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 05:51:42 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTtShXr_dhrMJ7dcCqq_bXt30Te+rGsY=GN2UtUx_oj8MA@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000735ba705eb2ff6ed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/k2gE88sdIWzFePeAaO2L0We02to>
Subject: [Teas] Fwd: FW: Directorate Early Reviews
Precedence: list

WG,

Please note (below) the early routing directorate review policy
recommendation from the Routing ADs. We will be mandating this step in our
WG process for all documents going forward.
We have initiated this review process for the following 2 documents:
- draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
- draft-ietf-teas-pcecc-use-cases

Regards,
- Pavan and Lou

*From: *Andrew Alston - IETF <andrew-ietf@liquid.tech>
*Date: *Wednesday, 12 October 2022 at 1:00 PM
*To: *rtg-chairs@ietf.org <rtg-chairs@ietf.org>
*Subject: *Directorate Early Reviews


Hi All,



Following the helpful feedback received during chair’s meeting and further
discussion between the routing AD’s, we would like to propose the following:



   1. We will require early directorate reviews before documents come to
   the AD’s to enter the publication queue
   2. We suggest that these reviews are done either in parallel with the
   working group last call or between the working group last call and
   publication request


   1. In the case of the early directorate review being done in parallel
      with the last call, it is suggested to use this approach only if there is
      indication that the document is stable, since we ask that the
early review
      is done on the version of the document that will be received by
the AD’s at
      the time of requested publication.


   1. While we require early review from the routing directorate, it is in
   the chair’s discretion if they wish to request early review from other
   directorates.  As a guideline, we recommend a security directorate review
   in addition to the routing area directorate.



We are still discussing all the feedback (and there was a lot of
substantive feedback), so expect more from us in the coming weeks regarding
the rest of the feedback.



Thanks



Andrew Alston (On Behalf of the Routing AD’s)







Internal All Employees

Juniper Business Use Only

[Teas] Fwd: FW: Directorate Early Reviews Vishnu Pavan Beeram