Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07.txt

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 21 June 2018 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE131310C3 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.695
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.795, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwjVIiB11p3J for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B71131093 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC75B1E0A44 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:10:25 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id W41xfSfEqBMJeW41xfNtch; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:10:01 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2qibZtZ0T4zeyxVWYsGPgpGeh5n62G/J7yoxkstI1JA=; b=RvtZn/supJYBmGVx96PoTeLBKC iu254WFk5q19GYlfhzSko0HZ7UwK9e1x3TJg43raL4rKfWrQREZOmeGcleZoy4vTpFhcYDmUE/mLZ 7t9aGt9BrZDG++b6Kht4XIo2i;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:42152 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1fW42L-003iKs-Hb; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:10:25 -0600
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
References: <152959758069.31881.2689983825497798984@ietfa.amsl.com> <FA1920CF-BAE2-4558-80AA-3D55844F24CD@cisco.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <23ba3992-44f5-6fdf-b9ab-f4606585ab61@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:10:24 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FA1920CF-BAE2-4558-80AA-3D55844F24CD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1fW42L-003iKs-Hb
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:42152
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/kmWXuh6BbxQTGdw_6FekqLgR87Q>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:10:39 -0000

Hi Zafar/Authors,

     I don't believe a technical response has ever been sent to the list 
to Pavan's comments sent a while back:

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/EkvDNY0Sa4wUdlLYtg7fkNon0jA

It would be helpful for one to be sent now. -- You should at least 
summarize how each point is addressed by the current text, or how you 
propose to resolve the point if not covered in the draft.

Thank you,

Lou


On 6/21/2018 1:50 PM, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
>
> Dear WG,
>
> We have posted a new revision of the draft with minor editorial 
> changes. Will appreciate any comments from the WG.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
> *From: *Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of 
> "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, June 21, 2018 at 12:13 PM
> *To: *"i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *"teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07.txt
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>
> This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and 
> Signaling WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title : Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering 
> (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path
>
>         Authors : George Swallow
>
>                           Clarence Filsfils
>
>                           Kenji Kumaki
>
>                           Deutsche Telekom AG
>
> Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07.txt
>
> Pages : 17
>
> Date            : 2018-06-21
>
> Abstract:
>
>      There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics
>
>      such as cost, delay and delay variation associated with the TE link
>
>      formed by Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the
>
>      ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the
>
>      Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to
>
>      support automatic collection of cost, delay and delay variation
>
>      information for the TE link formed by a LSP.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording-07
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission
>
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Teas mailing list
>
> Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas