Re: [Teas] Connectivity matrix in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo

Cyril Margaria <cyril.margaria@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2016 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cyril.margaria@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D242A12D0B7 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v2XgGsQPQPmM for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E1C12D099 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x233.google.com with SMTP id fh2so22768249igd.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=3p+3ZShS0WoZe9tERNPoK1V/XlvNF61QxjV+SzdbPxM=; b=kUa+BcOCcX+jWVCgr8radDeIWukuBdavXXhwk0kJiEqRD+uGw1BGvrKlKdbaKc7qV1 4D/q1j21MWKU5o0PlKg4b5vuj1IDKi3S4uln/JDQyqO1O6LEBqWQPRiP9NX8U63L5Rfh JDACHmCflldO0nnHCiwVLSVwdiUopA7dlD/1YSC0225cJbany3MoeBF0EGpy6ngkaiOS OAnj1e6/0hQR8UIflgfNRNO1QW/guYtq1FMeK7zFdei8q7sbLtxGetP32ZKuGGv+S0Zx ly45nv+8p6SIK0Si+AucBwjWaNtl31+FMJeceuOpiR/+LjUoLMbDNNEzmM3yMeesUij3 lgXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3p+3ZShS0WoZe9tERNPoK1V/XlvNF61QxjV+SzdbPxM=; b=Z/8wkkaZLMeY5JCzUlJNsk+eFMhSHsSi+HISKDFfKC4SRQw+Xnvp0JoZJffkkmdAf2 FqvGsDz0NVxDtOG1fMstkzs1V3WWPEKShJAa7r+dJYhi0bog7k4ZNt25D7cK+thdX1o1 vY91bUUpona4WWRxIPLm1CIswRddk5yvgkXLe0fXihkHSE9w0Vf3SV+c6u6LwVdLCbCJ enOMBWu23gBkL102leCofy/cx7fnygoU8sEBVfmYtpKRQWP0cHtIuUEVyLOWSuhpA+zJ GbB4CdZa2EKSnAgsm5svVEeE/uD07aFmQLjveXGwEuKR2P/VNcSPFuaqGJc/6SXXNo0N Y/eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVyymEnvs3K08jJ+aFI5zDmG4YZ4P1RlqoiUsimxlJ4pr9H/m21hqL3h5SvDiHLc0faHyiRhmw/JyEE2Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.8.2 with SMTP id n2mr12779081iga.39.1464010858221; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.5.72 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <02d101d1af76$b0317cd0$10947670$@gmail.com>
References: <02d101d1af76$b0317cd0$10947670$@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:40:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CADOd8-ueX_DJc-kZwNXjuu964vXAXWm=HOHGZY2ML74ok4g6=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cyril Margaria <cyril.margaria@gmail.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d0dcc26fb3d0533829788"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/njFnykKjTz_DTST4W0p7qR4QYwA>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Connectivity matrix in draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:41:01 -0000

Hi,

Another item that can be considered is to add a Label (Following RFC7579)
restrictions. This is needed, for example,  in case of Fixed muxponders,
where the connectivity between the Low order ODUs to the high-order ODU is
fixed on each end.

Can it be added to the list of changes for the connectivity matrix?

Thanks,
Cyril

On 16 May 2016 at 09:27, Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Authors and contributors have discussed the use case of abstract topology,
> to address the incompleteness of connectivity matrix.
>
> Current connectivity modeling is as follows:
>
>       |     +--rw connectivity-matrix* [id]
>       |     |  +--rw id            uint32
>       |     |  +--rw from
>       |     |  |  +--rw tp-ref?   leafref
>       |     |  +--rw to
>       |     |  |  +--rw tp-ref?   leafref
>       |     |  +--rw is-allowed?   Boolean
>
> A Link TP may connect or disconnect to another Link TP, without detailed
> information such as cost and resource sharing restriction. To get a better
> abstraction of such connectivity, the following additional attributes are
> planned to be added:
>
>   max-bandwidth?               decimal64
>   max-resv-bandwidth?          decimal64
>   unreserved-bandwidth* [priority]
>   priority     uint8
>      +-- bandwidth?   decimal64
>      +-- te-default-metric uint32
>   performance-metric // re-use the container from te-link-atrributes
>   te-srlgs           // re-use the container from te-link-atrributes
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Xufeng
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>