[Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 16 May 2018 20:16 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E669C1273E2; Wed, 16 May 2018 13:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152650177191.31124.17631117605089370768@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 13:16:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/o5GWPSUlH17VnJ_7985FNorApHs>
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 20:16:12 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling WG of the IETF. Title : Recommendations for RSVP-TE and Segment Routing LSP co-existence Authors : Harish Sitaraman Vishnu Pavan Beeram Ina Minei Siva Sivabalan Filename : draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2018-05-16 Abstract: Operators are looking to introduce services over Segment Routing (SR) LSPs in networks running Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP-TE) LSPs. In some instances, operators are also migrating existing services from RSVP-TE to SR LSPs. For example, there might be certain services that are well suited for SR and need to co-exist with RSVP-TE in the same network. Such introduction or migration of traffic to SR might require co-existence with RSVP-TE in the same network for an extended period of time depending on the operator's intent. The following document provides solution options for keeping the traffic engineering database consistent across the network, accounting for the different bandwidth utilization between SR and RSVP-TE. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexis… internet-drafts