Re: [Teas] [EXTERNAL] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-04

["Rokui, Reza" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Reza


From: Ivan Bykov <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, April 5, 2024 at 2:39 PM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>
Cc: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <[e-mail]>, Richard Roberts <[e-mail]>, Julian Lucek <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, Rokui, Reza <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] <[e-mail]>, TEAS WG <[e-mail]>, TEAS WG Chairs <[e-mail]>
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-04
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Ivan.


On 5 Apr 2024, at 12:10, Julian Lucek <[e-mail]> wrote:

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

thanks

Julian



Juniper Business Use Only
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>
Date: Friday, 5 April 2024 at 17:57
To: Krzysztof Szarkowicz <[e-mail]>, Richard Roberts <[e-mail]>, Julian Lucek <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Ivan Bykov <[e-mail]>, "Rokui, Reza" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Cc: TEAS WG <[e-mail]>, TEAS WG Chairs <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls-04

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Fixing Amit's email-ID (@authors -- please have the credentials of Amit and John fixed in the next revision).

Regards,
-Pavan

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 10:16 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GHKdn0zTnwhAaU9zhskUKUa3ZksnUE3Fx9U-8KI8_ctpOHEEgG6a6q3lSfp17erhFPkNoP6ztU0dWGQJaNt_$>.

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs


Disclaimer

This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of Ribbon Communications Inc. and its Affiliates that is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, including any attachments.