IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03: (with COMMENT)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2015 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CE11B2ACD; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HfBSXs1oqWI; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD62F1B2ACA; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ioc74 with SMTP id 74so9250128ioc.2; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=crno+En3K0Mwr5/T/Hz9gN8Txs7C4vUos6DLQenBZeE=; b=a36ZyG/6jFANpQnd2ZYyeFhO7b3nL1w0eJk55OqdGz1Uby+Zh+942dtGMvnUiBCYqq Lm1wLzvApcsvHM7AhK5UDvjVsKMxqpO5svJAadKAdx06ncSE3V+q0mO/QUy2sfGQ5Lfu J1fGOflA4zQ5bz+j4bto++Ma1JwjoG8lw1WbokrBkUXilzva2oOJoU7gxSrgnJgVxwin TRz71cBPXtwwohRfIE7+acFsDUJBm8Chmldjd9udr28zxYsvpav/2G15EReKFG7i31mg RZeOhxAgEFcywd7HrSYlaf9EReF0ipiU8OUK4M0CNuJOQMhikP3ej6W21uYd8OF7jliQ qiLw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.26.12 with SMTP id a12mr13472793ioa.155.1447742310128; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.249.5 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:38:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-ev_uCYvdhB0MGBaacSpFf3+3623uYChZUChxPVw7Af6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151117023622.11790.78501.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-ev_uCYvdhB0MGBaacSpFf3+3623uYChZUChxPVw7Af6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:08:30 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn62RgGVEs_C+=jqTmZGFpOqDia2PMEcjANU446uFSdsiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fe39e1f1fb20524b6c66a"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/pMP1IEMCLUoCh5YiyZdBIiFae_g>
Cc: "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects@ietf.org>, "vbeeram@juniper.net" <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "dhruv.dhody@huawei.com" <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 06:38:33 -0000

Hi Spencer,

Updated in the working copy as per your suggestion. Thanks!

Regards,
Dhruv

On Tuesday 17 November 2015, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I got this confused myself - what I meant was
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Spencer Dawkins <
> spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> In this text:
>>
>>    The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood
>>    by legacy implementations.  If one of the subobjects is received in a
>>    RSVP-TE object that does not understand it, it will behave as
>>    described in [RFC3209] and [RFC4874].
>>
>> I think something is confused. Do RSVP-TE objects understand subobjects?
>> Or is this
>>
>>    The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood
>>    by legacy implementations.  If a legacy implementations receives one
>>    of the subobjects in an RSVP-TE object that it does not understand,
>> the
>>    legacy implementation will behave as described in [RFC3209] and
>> [RFC4874].
>>
>> correct?
>>
>
>    The new subobjects introduced by this document will not be understood
>    by legacy implementations.  If a legacy implementation receives one
>    of the subobjects that it does not understand in an RSVP-TE object,
> the
>    legacy implementation will behave as described in [RFC3209] and
> [RFC4874].
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email