[Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 21 September 2022 18:41 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, teas@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
Message-ID: <166378567729.12663.18018064113769612709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:41:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/r8je8laXmKAqhnQQPhpZTBzuigA>
Subject: [Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Alvaro Retana's DISCUSS position.

Could the example HMAC use in the Security Considerations section be updated
from HMAC-MD5 to something more modern (eg HMAC-SHA2) or is there a valid
operational reason to stick with HMAC-MD5 ?

[Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-l… Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Re: [Teas] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ie… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)