Re: [Teas] Some stray thoughts on draft-wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang was ....

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

mmm no it was not me that sent this prematurely, doubtless AI at work:-(
 
completions (I hope) below

________________________________________
From: Teas <[e-mail]> on behalf of tom petch <[e-mail]>
Sent: 23 August 2023 11:33

I share Joel's concern - it does seem premature with the undecided or unresolved issues relating to NRP (or whatever name emerges)

Meanwhile, I looked at the YANG

Normative references are required for

6991 -
8294 -
8519 -
8776 -
draft-bestbar-teas-yang-topology-filter

and for whatever contains srv6-types which is not a module I can find in IANA

'This draft defines ...'
perhaps 'document'

The document title is sometimes spelt as a plural but more often in the singular

NRP would benefit from a reference where it first appears.

SLO SLE need expanding on first use

        WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/>
is out of date twice

         "RFC XXX: A YANG Data Model for Network Resource Partition";
perhaps
         "RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for Network Resource Partitions";

             leaf maximum-bandwidth {
what are the units?

         presence "indicates NRP IGP congruent";
I think that congruence needs defining.  If two triangles are congruent, then I know what must be the same, what must be different.  I do not have that understanding for network topology

         units "bps";
bits or bytes?

         "Introduces new network type for NRP topology";
reminds me of a decrepit and rusty sign  on the road near me that announces a new road layout, dating from over a decade ago.

   The following individuals, authors of
   [I-D.bestbar-teas-yang-nrp-policy] and [I-D.wd-teas-nrp-yang],
   contributed to this consolidated document:

Should that also include
draft-wd-teas-vtn-network-yang-00.txt 6jun21 22pp
If only to point out another name change in the predecessors?

Tom Petch
(who  will now press send)

________________________________________
From: Teas <[e-mail]> on behalf of Lou Berger <[e-mail]>
Sent: 22 August 2023 18:02
To: Joel Halpern; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Teas] The TEAS WG has placed draft-wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

FWIW the adoption call will start once we have all IPR declarations...

On 8/22/2023 12:57 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
> While this mostly looks like a good start, I am concerned that adopting
> it would presume that we know what the correct representation for NRP
> identification is for the various cases (IPv6, SRv6, and MPLS.)  As none
> of those are as far as I know adopted by the respective working groups,
> it seems premature to adopt that.
>
> It seems to me that we can either adopt this with placeholders for
> identification (indicating that we will work on it later), or defer
> adoption.
>
> Yours,
>
> Joel
>
> On 8/22/2023 8:51 AM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
>> The TEAS WG has placed draft-wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang in state
>> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)
>>
>> The document is available at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wdbsp-teas-nrp-yang/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas