Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 10 April 2018 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D15012D77E for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0z4X0_nJr_-G for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D404129C51 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3AEGBaV000403; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:16:11 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F1B2204A; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:16:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C6A22046; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:16:11 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (81.38.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.38.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w3AEGA6f019156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:16:11 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org, db3546@att.com
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:16:09 +0100
Message-ID: <033101d3d0d6$79a21340$6ce639c0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdPQ1mtAM97SEuXPTWe/evya/161fg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23774.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.744-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.744-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23774.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--21.744400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Jm7Yxmmj9OnMi6swfqIoFLiMC5wdwKqdTJDl9FKHbrlaW2Ktn+I8/uHd jWrhA46s91IuP6TUd8MBlCsZigWHljB9eXnpC3lIxOn/W/avbxMpWss5kPUFdMWkDW4kV3WaA4e V6z+cHCciCCBnvzbde98nnBjUGhRR8Q4LkEcU9RrKl4yJoI+fG81eA/uWJnkimBadosOIaCHNUt B8XIq6i3eYQv69Sp5fh3OJcK8eYURbRbA/K/rHzMzWN98iBBeGQNrgRraxTQHszSHnsvb4wWHwu t3qZqvb48CHU6S1ISHOCRsgJ4DzkWc+SC3SVVYcsyNb+yeIRAr2acON9Q+rnuCv/NhMM5kI6IO4 BLC7c+cVXGV0/dnCGkn9+HVQ+Q5HpdOab103kUeKgrTfdYmQKW79evoIpeI3V5WJzvNfLz92eLS H9FRxBPCQ39OgwArzq4mbZC4LGM37OgBbxHXmX7xygpRxo469IZm2INWXDp5k2J2ef3Nd3/TrP5 e8ec7Bt+odoSua73aRk6XtYogiarQ/aqQZTRfKVnRXm1iHN1bEQdG7H66TyKsQd9qPXhnJVWgRc rSEFLc=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/usv72ZRKdkL5nhCfJEYMUpKR0xE>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:16:32 -0000

WG and AD,

Small updates to address IESG Comments.

New section...
2.4.1.  Interaction Between Time-Scheduled and Ad Hoc Reservations

   There will, of course, be a mixture of resource uses in a network.
   For example, normal unplanned LSPs may be requested alongside TS-TE
   LSPs.  When an unplanned LSP is requested no prior accommodation can
   be made to arrange resource availability, so the LSP can be placed no
   better than would be the case without TS-TE.  However, the new LSP
   can be placed considering the future demands of TS-TE LSPs that have
   already been requested.  Of course, the unplanned LSP has no known
   end time and so any network planning must assume that it will consume
   resources for ever.

Tweak to 3.2
OLD
   But it must be noted that service requests for future LSPs are known
   in terms of the LSPs whose paths are computed and for which resources
   are scheduled.  For example, if the requester of a future LSP decides
   to cancel the request or to modify the request, the PCE must be able
   to map this to the resources that were reserved.  When the LSP or the
   request for the LSP with a number of time intervals is cancelled, the
   PCE must release the resources that were reserved on each of the
   links along the path of the LSP in every time intervals from the TED.
   If the bandwidth reserved on a link for the LSP is B from time T2 to
   T3 and the unreserved bandwidth on the link is B2 from T2 to T3, B is
   added to the link for the time interval from T2 to T3 and the
   unreserved bandwidth on the link from T2 to T3 will be B2 + B.
NEW
   But it must be noted that service requests for future LSPs are known
   in terms of the LSPs whose paths are computed and for which resources
   are scheduled.  For example, if the requester of a future LSP decides
   to cancel the request or to modify the request, the PCE must be able
   to map this to the resources that were reserved.  When the LSP or the
   request for the LSP with a number of time intervals is cancelled, the
   PCE must release the resources that were reserved on each of the
   links along the path of the LSP in every time intervals from the TED.
   If the bandwidth that had been reserved for the LSP on a link was B
   from time T2 to T3 and the unreserved bandwidth on the link was B2
   from T2 to T3, then B is added back to the link for the time interval
   from T2 to T3 and the unreserved bandwidth on the link from T2 to T3
   will be seen to be B2 + B.
END

Now back to Deborah to make sausages.

Thanks,
Adrian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 10 April 2018 15:09
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: teas@ietf.org
> Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG
> of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Framework for Scheduled Use of Resources
>         Authors         : Yan Zhuang
>                           Qin Wu
>                           Huaimo Chen
>                           Adrian Farrel
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 22
> 	Date            : 2018-04-10
> 
> Abstract:
>    Time-scheduled reservation of traffic engineering (TE) resources can
>    be used to provide resource booking for TE Label Switched Paths so as
>    to better guarantee services for customers and to improve the
>    efficiency of network resource usage at any moment in time including
>    future planned network usage.  This document provides a framework
>    that describes and discusses the architecture for supporting
>    scheduled reservation of TE resources.  This document does not
>    describe specific protocols or protocol extensions needed to realize
>    this service.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-scheduled-resources-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas