[Teas] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8400 (5400)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 21 June 2018 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4319130FCA for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w5GDBt8wdDEy for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8ADE130E5D for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9E42FB81A02; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: huaimo.chen@huawei.com, hliu@ciena.com, tsaad@cisco.com, fengman.xu@verizon.com, huanglu@chinamobile.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, lberger@labn.net, vbeeram@juniper.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.thomson@gmail.com, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180621015738.9E42FB81A02@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 18:57:38 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/x93Mw-uav7OfrTsB7jtL5akOqo8>
Subject: [Teas] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8400 (5400)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 01:57:42 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8400,
"Extensions to RSVP-TE for Label Switched Path (LSP) Egress Protection".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5400

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
IETF Review [8216]

Corrected Text
--------------
IETF Review [8126]

Notes
-----
This looks like a simple typo.  RFC 8216 is "HTTP Live Streaming"; the intent seems to be "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs".

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8400 (draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection-16)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Extensions to RSVP-TE for Label Switched Path (LSP) Egress Protection
Publication Date    : June 2018
Author(s)           : H. Chen, A. Liu, T. Saad, F. Xu, L. Huang
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG