Re: [Teas] A question on the definitions of SDP and SAP

[Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>]

Hi Med,
thank you for pointing this out to me. I have a follow-up question. If I
understand that note correctly, SDP is positioned as an example, a
realization of SAP in IETF Network Slice. What could be other examples or
realizations of SAP?

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:50 AM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Greg,
>
>
>
> The slice draft already says the following:
>
>
>
>       An SDP may be abstracted as a Service Attachment Point (SAP)
>
>       [I-D.ietf-opsawg-sap] for the purpose generalizing the concept
>
>       across multiple service types and representing it in management
>
>       and configuration systems.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* Greg Mirsky <[e-mail]>
> *Envoyé :* lundi 21 mars 2022 12:17
> *À :* Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>; TEAS WG <[e-mail]>;
> opsawg <[e-mail]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <
> [e-mail]>
> *Objet :* A question on the definitions of SDP and SAP
>
>
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I've read the draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices/> (many
> thanks for all your work on it!) and I've got a question. It appears to me
> that the definition of a Service Demarcation Point section 2.1) as the
> point of where the IETF Network Slice service is delivered by the provider
> to a customer is similar to the definition of a Service Attachment Point in
> draft-ietf-opsawg-sap
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sap/> as an
> "abstraction of the network reference points where network services can be
> delivered to customers." Hence my question. Is there an intended difference
> between SDP and SAP that is indicated by using different terms?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>