Re: [Teas] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 20 July 2023 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12992C14CE51; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.843
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.843 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZwYUhwnKldh; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB38C14F75F; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3143b88faebso766081f8f.3; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1689863812; x=1690468612; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BQSSNswvAQwQ3FcAfHShhn1JS++HRYG2RX6jwDUxTQo=; b=hhci6JMCvkgCPNgtFCOHC9RcKsqSkhEpcwF9UoYzhIP0NiorFySOwi0u7y0wbPiLoO QO/yOS3PsUkoMoHWeb+F2Fmt0c76AkjQZIDOk+NM0FuzVlE1UWZEq/5HP94apf8D2Y/I Mw+bSfDfVg93s2RPCBCtdRChQB4mBSJUqbGoP2K6sJMIPhKHFBg+MINSWzsPSnLHwT7f 3ex4k993+MIsHJHjZUPztbPHVWSlWaVwqbFutsu1yKVn6MouTAAQpncJ4YidpDXfh5Eu IC//Rfd/Aa2/rgTmc8INYyLqFMw4YN6XKX99wYMjN05dokNuIGwNQ+QXdOEaYuaLE5pk PYjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689863812; x=1690468612; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BQSSNswvAQwQ3FcAfHShhn1JS++HRYG2RX6jwDUxTQo=; b=Ig7hsf++zkH9nMxcAsvPYPD35C7TFex6aF0pZQODu6Hwu++y05ZKJdH4NzUe756FWF 9I+yQFnf+UxAI4xMFWh/n3Sl9qytopOs7Sw9j2QzMlh+o1GEuy1iW+4VVKJOu2S8wHB/ tPBrH/J4z8VOgILFEgAYsS9flTqM5A52MQSAB16q02rKAqvYtuPm7zX7HTZMA41uve8o 5RUxrt1m9iAQdO4cpircv2kqL+tgy1SJlz1mHJhOfaStRiCuvp14xVfP2PkjBXiZclWq 0H93xOoMRjXvSuWm33/nAFk/3srirBSiBsx6ZIXQEcaca+IVXNTkMhyEpRiWD0Oc/8pf zdiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZ+hqD8uTDj9qmyDGoV6TrS8rcwAxPygwR+LKvOalLy2htjUBLI KWY3rcIbSkn9dNme3Ic6JcZzNs/EyBpjCK1fdohSkw70nwNnjw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEuGDCAOvCipjlfPR5fhUI9CGqiTv21+o25nN5V9ib1oSHcMm/37Lt9hVgMwO0q67K5oFxpywcwJbna5WkcOQY=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd90:0:b0:314:c2a:31c5 with SMTP id q16-20020adfcd90000000b003140c2a31c5mr2562995wrj.19.1689863812134; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 07:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168977241026.20221.9353844256722402673@ietfa.amsl.com> <DU2PR02MB1016030A456840AE7D1C4B226883EA@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB1016030A456840AE7D1C4B226883EA@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:36:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceXuwOHNO_eJ9Kb6VDynYiuK2ZK5ve9J_dow54kRzOdLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>, "tsv-art@ietf.org" <tsv-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003dba3d0600ec14b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xsi_wvTZ0ranoH9zIUdIibaWEbw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:36:58 -0000

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 1:03 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi Bob, Adrian, all,
>
> Please see inline some comment on the multipath part.
>
>

I support the changes suggested on the multipath/QUIC part. When I made my
review of  draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-24

I had noticed the issue but not bothered to report it.

It should be some minor and editorial corrections.

Behcet

> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Bob Briscoe via
> > Datatracker
> > Envoyé : mercredi 19 juillet 2023 15:14
> > À : tsv-art@ietf.org
> > Cc : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org;
> > teas@ietf.org
> > Objet : [Teas] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-
> > rfc3272bis-24
> >
> ...
> >
> > §5.1.1.4. (Layer-4) Transport-Based TE
> >
> > When the draft says no support for ATSSS splitting has yet been
> > developed for QUIC, it would be worth explaining why (e2e
> > cryptographic protection), and possibly referencing multipath QUIC
> > [draft-ietf-quic-multipath]. It seems rather odd to say so much
> > about QUIC (which ATSSS does not support)
>
> [Med] When the text was drafted (05/2021), there was no WG-adopted
> multipath extensions to QUIC. Since then, ATSSS supports both MPTCP and
> MPQUIC. TS23501 says the following:
>
> "The MPQUIC functionality enables steering, switching, and splitting of
> UDP traffic between the UE and UPF, in accordance with the ATSSS policy
> created by the network. The operation of the MPQUIC functionality is based
> on RFC 9298 [170] "proxying UDP in HTTP", which specifies how UDP traffic
> can be transferred between a client (UE) and a proxy (UPF) using the RFC
> 9114 [171] HTTP/3 protocol. The HTTP/3 protocol operates on top of the QUIC
> protocol (RFC 9000 [166], RFC 9001 [167] , RFC 9002 [168]), which supports
> simultaneous communication over multiple paths, as defined in
> draft-ietf-quic-multipath [174]."
>
>  and so little about
> > MPTCP (which ATSSS does use).
> >
> >
>
> [Med] I suggest to shorten the QUIC prose to be consistent with the spirit
> of the MPTCP text + insist on the native features supported by QUIC.
>
> I would also separate the MPDCCP text as this is not part of the ATSSS yet
> (although this is being proposed as a candidate for ATSSS in Rel-19)+ the
> applicability was restricted (?) in latest version of the spec (see
> "Concurrent path usage" section of that spec) + applicability to UDP
> traffic requires an encap which is not yet specified.
>
>
> OLD:
>    QUIC [RFC9000] is a UDP-based multiplexed and secure transport
>    protocol.  QUIC provides applications with flow-controlled streams
>    for structured communication, low-latency connection establishment,
>    and network path migration.
>
>    QUIC is a connection-oriented protocol that creates a stateful
>    interaction between a client and server.  QUIC uses a handshake
>    procedure that combines negotiation of cryptographic and transport
>    parameters.  This is a key differentiation from other transport
>    protocols.
>
>    With QUIC it is possible to support the ATSSS switching and steering
>    functions.  Indeed, QUIC supports a connection migration procedure
>    that allows peers to change their transport coordinates (IP
>    addresses, port numbers) without breaking the underlying QUIC
>    connection.  While no support for ATSSS splitting has yet been
>    developed for QUIC, extensions to Multipath Datagram Congestion
>    Control Protocol (MP-DCCP) [RFC4340] to provide support for splitting
>    data traffic of UDP and plain IP flows across multiple paths on a
>    per-packet level can be found in [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp].
>
> NEW:
>
>    Multipath QUIC [I-D.ietf-quic-multipath] and Proxying UDP in HTTP
>    [RFC9298] are used to provide the ATSSS service for UDP traffic.
>    Note that QUIC [RFC9000] natively support the switching and steering
>    functions.  Indeed, QUIC supports a connection migration procedure
>    that allows peers to change their transport coordinates (IP
>    addresses, port numbers) without breaking the underlying QUIC
>    connection.
>
>    Extensions to Datagram Congestion
>    Control Protocol (MP-DCCP) [RFC4340] to support multipath operations
>    can be found in [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-multipath-dccp].
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>