Re: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119
Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com> Mon, 05 February 2024 02:05 UTC
Return-Path: <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C159DC14F69D for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 18:05:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GkEpXnWvEkEI for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 18:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79573C14F5F9 for <teep@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 18:05:27 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee965c04264ef5-9def8; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:05:26 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee965c04264ef5-9def8
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[10.2.52.72]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee365c0426446a-905ad; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:05:25 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee365c0426446a-905ad
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:05:25 +0800
From: Meiling Chen <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>
To: "teep@ietf.org" <teep@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.115[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202402051005249671903@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart285063332861_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/GXvpL7w3hcdaAEA-r5mQOq4-JTI>
Subject: Re: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 02:05:33 -0000
Hi all, Penglin’s message to teep was blocked. I’m resending it. Meiling From: ypl_ietf@163.com Date: 2024-02-04 17:24 To: teep Subject: Re: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119 Hi TEEP participants, Recently I updated the teep-usecase draft to 05 version. It would be very appreciated that if you could review and comment it. If there has any problems, I will try to revise it before 119 meeting. Hope this draft could progress rapidly : ) BR Penglin Yang ypl_ietf@163.com From: Nancy Cam-Winget \(ncamwing\) Date: 2024-02-03 00:16 To: teep@ietf.org Subject: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119 Hello TEEP participants, As was mentioned at IETF 118, we are nearing publication of the main Protocol draft as issues have been resolved. There is one remaining informational draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teep-usecase-for-cc-in-network/05/ that we can discuss on the mail list and assess readiness for last call as well. Best, Nancy
- Re: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119 Meiling Chen
- [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119 Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
- Re: [Teep] No sessions scheduled for IETF 119 Muhammad Usama Sardar