Re: [Teep] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-14: (with COMMENT)

[Dave Thaler <[e-mail]>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TEEP <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Erik Kline via Datatracker
> Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2023 8:15 AM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Teep] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-
> 14: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-14: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> w.ietf.org%2Fabout%2Fgroups%2Fiesg%2Fstatements%2Fhandling-ballot-
> positions%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C503bff0aefbe
> 4935b6e108db1d0646c6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%
> 7C638135685041608732%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%
> 7C&sdata=CMEH6gbxB%2BijVNGMWtpAB3hNLi33uDY0kn78o7aXA30%3D&re
> served=0
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata
> tracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-
> http%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C503bff0aefbe4935
> b6e108db1d0646c6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C63
> 8135685041608732%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMD
> AiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C
> &sdata=yZdlyNDLEPZI6WeKUyO4%2B82cMNBjfXe5AxXGNeN15rE%3D&reser
> ved=0
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> # Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-14
> CC @ekline
> 
> ## Comments
> 
> ### S5.6, S6.4
> 
> * Is there any discussion that can be referenced for how to set "reasonable"
>   timeouts?  Even though the HTTP transport layer may be up and
> functioning,
>   how long is too long to wait for message processing before an error should
>   be declared by one of the layers?
> 
>   I'm sure the timeout needs might vary according to many different factors,
>   but does the desired timeout need to be conveyed by some mechanism to
> the
>   TEEP/HTTP {Client,Server} layer?

Added
"Note that no timeout check is used at the TEEP/HTTP Client layer;
any timeout would be handled inside the TEEP Agent."
(Actually even a step later than that, inside a SUIT implementation, but the transport spec only refers to the TEEP protocol spec directly.)

I confirmed with all the other implementers at the TEEP hackathon table that
all are in agreement.  

> ## Nits
> 
> ### S7
> 
> * Item 1: s/cient/client/

Fixed, thanks.

Github copy at https://github.com/ietf-teep/teep-over-http
has been updated, and I expect to post -15 after the TEEP meeting on Monday.

Dave