Re: telnet encryption option documentation

"James M. Galvin" <galvin@eit.com> Tue, 06 February 1996 14:48 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12405; 6 Feb 96 9:48 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12401; 6 Feb 96 9:48 EST
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07127; 6 Feb 96 9:48 EST
Received: from ironwood.cray.com (daemon@ironwood-fddi.cray.com [128.162.21.36]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with ESMTP id IAA25064; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:46:41 -0600
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ironwood.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-ccm_serv-8-2.8) id IAA25146 for telnet-ietf_list@sdiv; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:45:32 -0600
Received: from t2.cray.com (root@t2 [128.162.19.5]) by ironwood.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-ccm_serv-8-2.8) with ESMTP id IAA25141 for <telnet-ietf@ironwood.cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:45:30 -0600
Received: from timbuk.cray.com (root@timbuk.cray.com [128.162.19.7]) by t2.cray.com (8.6.12/craymail-smart) with ESMTP id IAA11195 for <telnet-ietf@cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:45:30 -0600
Received: from eitech.eit.com (eitech.eit.com [192.100.58.2]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with ESMTP id IAA24829 for <telnet-ietf@cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:45:29 -0600
Received: from [153.37.6.39] (pool039.Max6.Washington.DC.DYNIP.ALTER.NET [153.37.6.39]) by eitech.eit.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id GAA01531; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 06:45:06 -0800
X-Sender: galvin@pop.eit.com
Message-Id: <v02140a04ad3d00f02174@[153.37.7.57]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 09:48:05 -0400
To: dave@tlogic.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "James M. Galvin" <galvin@eit.com>
Subject: Re: telnet encryption option documentation
Cc: telnet-ietf@cray.com

At 4:46 PM 2/5/96, David Aylesworth wrote:
>I am looking form documentation on the telnet encryption option.  Has the
>telnet encryption option been dropped by the telnet working group, or has the
>functionality been rolled into another effort?

Sort of rolled into another effort.  There is a draft document in your
favorite internet drafts directory that combines the encryption option with
the authentication option.

The draft needs a revision, based on comments I've received, after which it
should advance.  Of course it's been a while, ....

Give it a read and let me know what you think,

Jim