Re: edit control character negotiation?

Jordan Brown <jbrown@qdeck.com> Fri, 16 April 1993 21:59 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14453; 16 Apr 93 17:59 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14449; 16 Apr 93 17:59 EDT
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02197; 16 Apr 93 17:59 EDT
Received: from hemlock.cray.com by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.17) id AA07991; Fri, 16 Apr 93 16:59:48 CDT
Received: by hemlock.cray.com id AA00195; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Fri, 16 Apr 93 16:59:44 CDT
Received: from cray.com (timbuk.cray.com) by hemlock.cray.com id AA00188; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Fri, 16 Apr 93 16:59:39 CDT
Received: from rockall.qdeck.com (qdeck.com) by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.17) id AA07986; Fri, 16 Apr 93 16:59:37 CDT
Received: from angel.qdeck.com by rockall.qdeck.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14002; Fri, 16 Apr 93 14:59:37 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jordan Brown <jbrown@qdeck.com>
To: braden@isi.edu, telnet-ietf@cray.com
Subject: Re: edit control character negotiation?
X-Mailer: ScoMail 1.0
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 14:57:00 -0700
Message-Id: <9304161457.aa11436@angel.qdeck.com>

> I believe that the intent of the Telnet authors in 1974 (I was present
> at most of the meetings) was this:  if a client has a local convention
> for erase line and erase character, it should either implement them
> locally, or translate the characters into the corresponding Telnet
> escape sequences.  So, no negotiation was thought to be logically
> necessary.

An excellent point, and one I'd forgotten.  I think I'll teach my telnet
client to do it and see how many servers it works on...