IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: CA*net report

Scott Brim <swb@dainichi.tn.cornell.edu> Wed, 21 March 1990 22:12 UTC

Received: by devvax.TN.CORNELL.EDU (5.59-1.12/1.3-Cornell-Theory-Center) id AA04846; Wed, 21 Mar 90 17:12:19 EST
Received: from TENNESSEE.TN.CORNELL.EDU by devvax.TN.CORNELL.EDU (5.59-1.12/1.3-Cornell-Theory-Center) id AA04842; Wed, 21 Mar 90 17:12:11 EST
Received: from DAINICHI.TN.CORNELL.EDU by chumley.TN.Cornell.EDU (5.59-1.11/2.0) with SMTP id AA14448; Wed, 21 Mar 90 17:12:07 EST
Message-Id: <9003212212.AA14448@chumley.TN.Cornell.EDU>
To: Dennis Ferguson <dennis@gw.ccie.utoronto.ca>
Cc: tewg@devvax.TN.CORNELL.EDU
Subject: Re: CA*net report
In-Reply-To: Dennis Ferguson's message of Wed, 14 Mar 90 14:56:17 -0500. <90Mar14.145621est.41307@gw.ccie.utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 1990 17:12:17 -0500
From: Scott Brim <swb@dainichi.tn.cornell.edu>

Hi Dennis.  I finally got a chance to take a look carefully at your
CA*net <-> NSFNet interconnection design.  Your mentioning that you
can't have "third party" BGP neighbor announcements makes me wonder --
do we really need that restriction?  I guess I'll just let Guy Almes
read this and he can answer it on the IWG list. ;-|.  Also, what are
you doing about the proposed NASA connection to somewhere, Halifax I
think?  
							Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email