[therightkey] draft-tschofenig-iab-webpki-evolution-00

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 22 October 2013 06:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F83011E816D for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGeJdI0gs0O2 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FA111E8477 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 23:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.254.200] ([80.92.115.161]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMCSP-1VeFsD044L-0082B7 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:49:20 +0200
Message-ID: <5266200B.7060501@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:49:47 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: therightkey@ietf.org
References: <52661FCE.6040209@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <52661FCE.6040209@gmx.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <52661FCE.6040209@gmx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:VpHugzJWj4pUTLx39TZWGWU3evgENDzz0VsNDUU3uOZI1O0TYO0 W+NoSUFiMjrSfIWVhJPSfScCFhVWsDdsMsyhLMbScqFw8EW3eD6KU7lp8MeffXxCdFwjrng mC1kuOQSLyMrg2sBropA2kaxP0EG+vVr+cFx7ycvBMasXbl8+BfLVVxbtmYocQC+DZcNPU2 4icPV8EFRJxwS6swBS9ng==
Cc: hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net
Subject: [therightkey] draft-tschofenig-iab-webpki-evolution-00
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:49:25 -0000

Hi all,

one item that predates the pervasive surveillance debate is the
discussion about improving the public key infrastructure (but still has
relevance in this discussion, see
https://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=15579).

Following the workshop at NIST earlier this year the IAB and ISOC have
been reaching out to different players (and are still doing that) to
continue the conversation.

We have put together a first document that describes the different
proposals (and as you can see the level of detail available for them and
their maturity varies greately). Here is the writeup:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-iab-webpki-evolution-00

The analysis is still a bit weak and requires more work but the
proposals are hopefully captured accurately. Let us know whether there
is something missing.

We hope that this could help to create move momentum behind certain
proposals to get them accepted by the community and widely deployed.

Ciao
Hannes