Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries
Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> Fri, 10 February 2012 14:19 UTC
Return-Path: <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B91F21F8757 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7v+S3JRO4Sya for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14B021F8749 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qcsg13 with SMTP id g13so1857292qcs.31 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.229.78.203 with SMTP id m11mr4447641qck.86.1328883564153; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (pool-173-79-172-61.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.79.172.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fd1sm13148144qab.1.2012.02.10.06.19.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:23 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:19:19 -0500
From: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Message-ID: <CB5A90BC.129AD%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Thread-Topic: [therightkey] Notes on notaries
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhgCSkgh5tx02dVBfU5nrjxHwQH+jq6FBurqu+BarQX2g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmiUXN/l1F2Kob62bh8mtKNj6y82H2hUnxrbzp8nlw2U2fJzoPNH5X6DB2kzgLdAQAUNAfj
Cc: therightkey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:19:25 -0000
On 2/10/12 9:13 AM, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com> wrote: >Yes, I am aware of them. > >The problem with LTANS was that the catenate cert technology was still >encumbered at the time and there was a company formed to exploit the >patents that was very aggressive in filing lawsuits, including >lawsuits over stuff that they clearly had no claim to. > > >I was just going through the LTANS work to see if there was stuff we >could use. > >The big reason to not use LTANS is that they use XML signature. It >made sense for their approach but I don't see it as really working >very well with the catenate technology. You would have to fire up an >XML parser on each hop. There were two evidence record formats defined by LTANS, one in ASN.1 and (later) one in XML. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4998 - ERS http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6283 - XMLERS
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Tom Ritter
- [therightkey] Notes on notaries Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Stephen Farrell
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Notes on notaries Phillip Hallam-Baker