Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-03: point 2
Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 17 December 2012 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529FF21F8514 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hN7i5eXundp1 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A80821F8509 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dr1so1802548wgb.1 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DblKUcWlHpK2soB//RluNkXbgOmv+cFAkOf/9dbIQlg=; b=PNOJ1tZslX35EHdY2sOnVwPwz8LVbzPjw4+9rea1XtlxFo2jkbjh+W9VGOZhoTaykT P7XLvGuNmHCzsGUojS1rrfpe2qwLa1XUGwRf6HCbOAabQIRwIFal0LkspQNugrVeNc7w fNxIJ4hmRmQJ+rN0a7F7pX952+bpT4z17juVAoT61YRJjpUo2feSEzSqkj1XSjxFSPIA DpjIC78ce/ci4MGFNBGDcRqOFww4YFMG4R7GktpQGwewBcAp/5izwS6HjsB3NZ6WxJrn uObDV9bD7YfLJ/EUZzqPkeeYVGkWpQiK93AKrKL50OsBfWSNSUfOWu4iU9fNvDk0Kpp0 qtQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=DblKUcWlHpK2soB//RluNkXbgOmv+cFAkOf/9dbIQlg=; b=FT2faKAoQDLojS1cavLnMeZJaAdlBobHT1Y/0PE1l7vZwj2k2GfTWFzpm700nxa0Au cNBib6GGv5pZyZ3/DEyOkj5zglFjgVJP8WrnAKGQjBYXfEGPsWq2PbYFMzgqHIe5J1QB +mHhMNv97JceVPN85uSr5Wy9J8za+iP0CPX90AbCA3/75OqiZiFvIt/Z0AfoJg+4fCJk R4syJoW5QZBHCbnM4q7lYwcI9iyT7kehqByks3OI4JStlZqQ11FEfGFrrRL6Cw0V3+Ir OcYhUXsAfVvBaseyTU3gFya1nGPGwzxCHCELQA6IwRFGyumyUiOItq1uG+joctjOA+hF LHLA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.81.170 with SMTP id b10mr17036749wiy.16.1355764090566; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.51.35 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:08:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50CF5045.4020909@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CABrd9SQNoWjNvpQw_fvQw-5eW7wh0hQB2cLvb31OoroqXqcBWg@mail.gmail.com> <50CF5045.4020909@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:08:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SR7FJqQBOLBO3+u_K9Obw14fy0+oC9Zn9RMQc-S16=d5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmp/bECGZgELTj10Mfx/P3ztoyKyaT3j+KEw4Eh+59uvomTJ4wQdIqcyGTbdJDhaRsWdXtcJV7uy1F5oprQqmorkADrs7L1PkTmUyGcXgFplWBTP0jrNdh/mgQS75vVPEd9UVu3TTAz/KHSgqRXVYm5nI7sa2fhZS3b+P+TxHCtKzCXPsv+nBcRdPfXbt4gi7yAIevM
Cc: therightkey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-03: point 2
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:08:12 -0000
On 17 December 2012 17:03, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > On 12/17/2012 04:51 PM, Ben Laurie wrote: >>> (2) abstract: "domain owners or their agents" makes it sound >>> like I might have to pay to monitor; be good to re-assure that >>> no such constraint is planned. (Such re-assurance doesn't need >>> to be in the abstract, arguably not even in the draft, but >>> also arguably ought be somewhere.) While its none of the >>> IETF's business who charges for what in general, in this case, >>> where there has been ongoing negative comment on the impact of >>> PKI business models on Internet security, I do think it'd be >>> good for the authors of proposals to be clear how they think >>> they're affecting such charging issues. Personally, I guess >>> that since EFF and some academics have been able to afford to >>> populate large databases of TLS server certs, this shouldn't >>> become a huge barrier, but it could in principle impose new >>> subscription costs or constraints on TLS servers or even >>> clients and that might not be a good plan. >> >> Well, a log isn't much use unless it is public - but I don't really >> know how to say much about who charges for what. We can state our >> intent to run free services, but presumably not in an RFC. So ... I >> don't really know how to address this. > > Yeah that's fair I guess. Maybe if it said that the intent > of the RFC is that logs be public & open and SHOULD NOT require > subscriptions or authentication for basic operation? Surely we can't make that kind of thing normative? Perhaps an indirect route would be to make a requirement on replication of data, e.g "logs MUST NOT impose any conditions on copying of their data", which would have a GPL-like effect of driving the price to zero for public logs? In any case this seems like a sensible thing to require! > > S. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> therightkey mailing list >> therightkey@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey >> >>
- [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunlight… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunl… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunl… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunl… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [therightkey] Review of draft-laurie-pki-sunl… Ben Laurie