IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] need to reschedule next NTP/TICTOC virtual interim

dieter.sibold@ptb.de Fri, 27 May 2016 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dieter.sibold@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827E512D5D1; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id In7jWwcuMjP5; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (mx1.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D317E12D1F0; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-hub.bs.ptb.de (smtpint01.bs.ptb.de [141.25.87.32]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de with ESMTP id u4R7CjFI031933-u4R7CjFJ031933; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:12:45 +0200
Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de (rose.bs.ptb.de [141.25.85.201]) by smtp-hub.bs.ptb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255EE21C9F9; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:12:45 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <FE911822-6F41-4F5A-B898-0D81CD601372@isoc.org>
References: <FE911822-6F41-4F5A-B898-0D81CD601372@isoc.org>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <OFCBB2506B.184970F7-ONC1257FC0.002792CB-C1257FC0.00279E0A@ptb.de>
From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:12:43 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-1"; boundary="-------z8084_boundary_sign"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/-FG1MOH-N_QVMjvHBOJO2wpZSYo>
Cc: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, TICTOC <tictoc-bounces@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] need to reschedule next NTP/TICTOC virtual interim
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:12:50 -0000

This is okay with me.

Greetings


-------------------------------------
Dr. Dieter Sibold
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Q.42 - Serversysteme und Datenhaltung
QM-Verantwortlicher der Stelle IT
Bundesallee 100 
D-38116 Braunschweig
Tel:    +49-531-592-84 20
E-Mail: dieter.sibold@ptb.de


"TICTOC" <tictoc-bounces@ietf.org> schrieb am 26.05.2016 20:43:45:

> Von: "Karen O'Donoghue" <odonoghue@isoc.org>
> An: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" 
> <tictoc@ietf.org>
> Datum: 26.05.2016 20:44
> Betreff: [TICTOC] need to reschedule next NTP/TICTOC virtual interim
> Gesendet von: "TICTOC" <tictoc-bounces@ietf.org>
> 
> Folks,
> 
> During our last virtual interim we discussed having another one on 
> Thursday 2 June. I need to reschedule, and I?d like to know if there
> are any strong objections to Thursday 9 June?
> 
> Thanks,
> Karen
> _______________________________________________
> TICTOC mailing list
> TICTOC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email