IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] Unicast discovery in 1588

Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> Sat, 05 April 2014 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <richardcochran@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F521A0470 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VALujSsN7gq6 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 08:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A321A01A5 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 08:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q5so2818993wiv.10 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pIQYM/ZmSl1+wsySM4IDcmTjnEgCgSQcY1dBRIDH5a4=; b=bvMR+iW9s05+UbYk1ZZCrajqn0bi1Kvd5micwVIk9vQYguBBiPDI9W9dktvAY0clnI 5Nk953vyqP3rjlE3Ucj2e2eaN+yvkd4ZgTUy0URs3Tu2VoX1Ix8dTFt/odIuKxoEH1UT nTtCLOpFrT54dL8BdF8TVsEXBEhtwHN7rHldY68es2Gn9Ul8Y5eX/FDa3tch4tXJFBBh /155SLxoD/AzZzVBtVQSUJYAU1tqWtuNJC5TnUqTNVD1xBkY6OvWmciEli7henRFyb2H ArAHAMM7zjDanIgJDXdd8B+3uN0S7RO6i3rj9/d51rfkceLcH+bkT08ryDE7vM21yBHK gCWg==
X-Received: by 10.180.187.225 with SMTP id fv1mr12671789wic.14.1396711042165; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netboy (089144207110.atnat0016.highway.bob.at. [89.144.207.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x45sm27661619eeu.23.2014.04.05.08.17.17 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:17:07 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Douglas Arnold <doug.arnold2@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140405151707.GA11004@netboy>
References: <20140405141335.GA6235@netboy> <CACQYgzEoLcOV2FD-=g3H3MqF+fCZFCwbcbAvxTtir37ZBFhTXg@mail.gmail.com> <20140405144710.GB6235@netboy> <CACQYgzGxOvDa-MLTTmDdmQvBZakGr79-mwGvoOvibvtPiJBZAQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACQYgzGxOvDa-MLTTmDdmQvBZakGr79-mwGvoOvibvtPiJBZAQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/-SzPUdEpRhuS3RNU8a72wpL3-FE
Cc: tictoc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Unicast discovery in 1588
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:17:42 -0000

On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:03:39AM -0700, Douglas Arnold wrote:
> In the implementations I know of, unicast mode is assumed from the start
> and configured via the user interfaces of all devices involved.  The PTP
> management messages are not used.

Okay, I see.

Getting back to the 1588 standard, would you agree then that clause
17.5.1 doesn't make any sense?

Thanks,
Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email