[TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchronization on Internet
J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar> Fri, 17 November 2017 13:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5604128954 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 05:18:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3-pxDopdCnDW for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 05:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnet.fi.uba.ar (cnet.fi.uba.ar [157.92.58.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9061E1270A3 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 05:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cnet.fi.uba.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475B6140082 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:12:51 -0300 (ART)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cnet.fi.uba.ar
Received: from cnet.fi.uba.ar ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cnet.fi.uba.ar [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DqUFjVk1xqG0 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:12:45 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [190.111.200.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cnet.fi.uba.ar (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 915F114006C for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:12:45 -0300 (ART)
From: J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin <ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FDD483DF-EA3B-455D-B7F8-365D012541C9@cnet.fi.uba.ar>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:18:28 -0300
To: tictoc@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/0p-o_yFwmLi445WE6M5X1xTl_z4>
Subject: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchronization on Internet
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:18:35 -0000
Dear all, I subscribed to this list because several people in IPPM WG pointed out this WG as the right one for this proposition. I joined the IPPM three years ago, and I participate in the meetings because part of my work is related to measurements on the Internet. Motivates with that, my research group developed a new proposal to synchronize two endpoints on the Internet (if you would like to measure delays in each way you need the clocks synchronization). I hope that I could prepare a draft for the IETF 101 about this topic (which carried some attention on IPPM), and I would like to confirm this interest on TICTOC, and also to know the deadline for the next meetings. With my best regards, Dr. Ing. José Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin _______________________________________________________________ CONICET and Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Buenos Aires Av. Paseo Colón 850 - C1063ACV - Buenos Aires - Argentina +54 (11) 5285 0716 / 5285 0705 e-mail: ihameli@cnet.fi.uba.ar web: http://cnet.fi.uba.ar/ignacio.alvarez-hamelin/ _______________________________________________________________
- [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchroniz… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
- Re: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchr… Greg Dowd
- Re: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchr… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
- Re: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchr… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin
- Re: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchr… Greg Dowd
- Re: [TICTOC] A new proposition about clock synchr… J Ignacio Alvarez-Hamelin