[TICTOC] operational experience with NTP symmetric mode

Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu> Thu, 05 May 2016 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sharon.goldbe@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAA512D548 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cAZo2-thIYio for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2074912B042 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id a17so36740638wme.0 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vHoKT4hm4u7TrI8ViyXzg8v2HZcWqv8UWSLHMmH1o3w=; b=R+5jpL1qnnIyDtm+yqF1Z1Vj6pwRMtoJVn0oAHL84yR9gaq3x6mUPAIvp6TXpZNR1P wunXuM5lQtjIn/8A5+gM77lQzFGjpNnxx78672pBHO2rB+KAo/NHCvyMkxK+KFWLx1EN XTI65DT/mizCkQ6LbYY93vp4CatnxcXrkSJ4X0+Q9tmtBD0/5LNzx212E6znChG9L3KP LWaq/CJjr0a4KZ/khLjuYWRk6A8Rer7ri/pL+9+5LhKMFRoMKZkPcHGLJpi+cwyJ6RhG 5zo3c6HYstzuhcpz4dp6wA30ImdF2I8KJ3qM02G1rwwEpYO1MA/JLOUMOMoLJwI+oi2K H+iQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=vHoKT4hm4u7TrI8ViyXzg8v2HZcWqv8UWSLHMmH1o3w=; b=LlJRtKCcWcclsLMuO5GZBQNEtECKdUcq3h0/MBMXjFveHWl51YVjZzlowh673r3YOZ viRX63+HLy1gh2fHG2vDVQ3PLkAgH3lf1nNrURYhh0v9JeQO1b+6qgOuF4ptveEgTGu7 xCGTZUTdiD/FnZMuPrrrg/PcGYSutLL99i4DPFH8zaqp6uPKTtL1TmnThCUrx9kDLM7g +O1vjCYKLmqxGSZzVBgfdSmJNYy8pBe4fre2m4s5RL7BDGJxlXABzfQGZcgmMXBbmU8/ BnaLh9pOhmtbXkVZKAhE5Ji4lxrOqw0znf8jUjCh4dfdIg7uEF1+QXBASxzFwqv4gIFQ iSbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FURiH+UNFUSwAdLt6IinFnN6Rpt+B1r69lz/IcbW3vBLJ/wXZnOQLEC1U/M4h1QJoNg2/E3KiqFIhuOOw==
X-Received: by 10.28.187.85 with SMTP id l82mr4534542wmf.2.1462465880660; Thu, 05 May 2016 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: sharon.goldbe@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.64.134 with HTTP; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sharon Goldberg <goldbe@cs.bu.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 12:30:41 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: rVnUmBZKdZBvcPScAa0hI-27q3w
Message-ID: <CAJHGrrQvSkdEdurig6XTWJi5DpGDitcfZeoLK3jj=qkJiiVV4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, tictoc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b069450204105321adff0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/3buIL7Nndxz3fjq5Oyaqa_i0P70>
Subject: [TICTOC] operational experience with NTP symmetric mode
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 16:31:24 -0000

Dear WG,

As part of the NTS effort, I think it would be helpful to understand the
importance of symmetric peering mode.

Can folks on this list please share their experience about using symmetric
mode?  Do you use it, and if so why (or why not), and if so in what
operational environment are you using it?

Thanks,
Sharon

-- 
Sharon Goldberg
Computer Science, Boston University
http://www.cs.bu.edu/~goldbe