IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] (no subject)

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Mon, 26 September 2016 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3399812B29C for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9iXEULq0M6b for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C61212B23C for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l131so156991452lfl.2 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yiDNo+sIx8aXXM4IHq3ht4u5aAev7HjDjFlrzyjPT9c=; b=luX/OtdSageKbNqUtp2Nx0JNW3YuOwVxNMbbZlj0A+Pmhp474/SpIGxx8O7bzHQL+Z /gBwGqpbSUPWdQTCLnMazB/2IQPeMaVdYr6SNCmB6LNGBkD6QMmjEQg4IsBMPcb+T9cn 3ycNYDlj4tD1efoBjCd6Hnh0X++ThdPfzTcBqlHI0DBw54tMlOSC5DYd7yUfKnrMpM1/ c2Zs5p9SbXsE6A+BsBabL4mcJvXccCLnlGSKzLQQMS566B+op/qTpG1qC8kbmtWFTTMS cI3ioXjLFLnBw7H9BJyQcwGcBwrYOyLePjWkhzYuC59t2UIqo01N84Ke8+odHZ7UZT9X hRlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yiDNo+sIx8aXXM4IHq3ht4u5aAev7HjDjFlrzyjPT9c=; b=QUdJda6BOwnCyA6Yytr1EqQRKT+NpIsVL/3T1ki1dRV0SZ+X4n4L8nr49/E79dDfgV 1AORp0nLXRg93zxllBvSRxlroWCz8tmLb3Vmg8vcGsG8J04z7jzf/yrkYsAS0HCURvNN lj5gVEORFm0IEKP1qESApY9HtcdXHIEJrj0PLMZwU0d3hGlGbxqpoCkrw71BeDNKLRTm IdgpbmRRPdmiT22sHmdREm2SvhNOV6+MVehss+bTRrs8F5dfb5Xa4bpzHMP03N0VpePP 3o5j1iAzFINOZ0f13YIIIaVIpbZ36NmTxGghCY4UBjeEU5shf4ZbmhPYcsyNvhdkYdwB c5yQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rkaa9lwVfUIq/1//ChppvNnsbXCIxhNTzaTb9K4DiZidP2rJirczQk8EPwmCRui5w==
X-Received: by 10.28.93.20 with SMTP id r20mr14856598wmb.89.1474920697137; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r2sm12893379wmf.14.2016.09.26.13.11.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, tictoc@ietf.org
References: <20160926192847.3DE10406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c4f9c9f5-c8f6-3adf-fc88-13c8db3b55ad@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:11:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160926192847.3DE10406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/A5zgv9mwJCdTq4aZvHa9BgQ8fLE>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:11:41 -0000


On 26/09/2016 20:28, Hal Murray wrote:
>>> "Each NTP clock has a set of N IP addresses. The assumption is that
>>>         the server information, including its multiple IP addresses is
>>>         known to the NTP clients." >
>> The base NTP protocol gets the time server addresses by configuration,  and
>> thus the assumption seems reasonable.
> The configuration info on a client is unlikely to know about multiple IP
> Addresses on the servers it is using.
>

True for the existing configs, but the authors are clearly assuming a 
modified configuration.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email