[TICTOC]Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 15 May 2024 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3974C1519A0; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171579648172.62540.16290147267861996902@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 11:08:01 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: DMA2WZJ64HPR72XZAV6MU56U2OWO37V6
X-Message-ID-Hash: DMA2WZJ64HPR72XZAV6MU56U2OWO37V6
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tictoc.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile@ietf.org, tictoc-chairs@ietf.org, tictoc@ietf.org, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk, ops-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: [TICTOC]Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: (with COMMENT)
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/BNrumylhZNkQvbj89N505Sb6Agw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tictoc-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tictoc-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tictoc-leave@ietf.org>

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you very much for writing this document - I found it an interesting read.

Also, much thanks to Tim Chown for their excellent Ops-Dir review
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-24-opsdir-lc-chown-2024-03-07/)
and to the authors for addressing the comments; I think that there is still one
remaining unaddressed comment ("In practice, would PTP operate over just one or
the other, or might messages be duplicated in each protocol?  How does the
profile look for a dual-stack environment?").