IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements

dieter.sibold@ptb.de Tue, 26 February 2013 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dieter.sibold@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08721F87ED for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.623, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18TuvQLMdaAG for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (MX1.Berlin.PTB.De [194.94.94.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EC021F87E9 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DCEC1107A4; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tulpe.berlin.ptb.de (r00031.berlin.ptb.de [172.30.200.131]) by MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4361107A0; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de ([141.25.85.201]) by tulpe.berlin.ptb.de (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP3) with ESMTP id 2013022614390931-40104 ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org>
References: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org>
To: odonoghue@isoc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: C11C13CD:ACE7569A-C1257B1E:004AEFFE; type=4; flags=0; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3FP3 November 15, 2012
Message-ID: <OFC11C13CD.ACE7569A-ONC1257B1E.004AEFFE-C1257B1E.004AFE9C@ptb.de>
From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:06 +0100
X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Serialize by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Serialize complete at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Itemize by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:09, S/MIME Sign complete at 26.02.2013 14:39:09, Serialize by Router on ROSE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:08, Serialize complete at 02/26/2013 14:39:08, Itemize by SMTP Server on TULPE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:09, Serialize by Router on TULPE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:10, Serialize complete at 02/26/2013 14:39:10
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="-------z11844_boundary_sign"
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:39:14 -0000

I recommend advancing this document.

Dieter


----------------------------------
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt
Q.42 - Server Administration
Dr. Dieter Sibold
Bundesallee 100 
D-38116 Braunschweig
Tel:    +49-531-592-84 20
Mobile
E-Mail: dieter.sibold@ptb.de



Von:    Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
An:     "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, NTP Working Group 
<ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, 
Datum:  25.02.2013 12:41
Betreff:        [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of 
draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
Gesendet von:   ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org




This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on 
advancing:

Title : Security Requirements of Time Synchronization Protocols in 
Packet Switched Networks
Author(s) : Tal Mizrahi
Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-04.txt
Pages : 32
Date : 2013-02-07

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements/

as an Informational RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support 
for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. 
Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last 
call will end on 12 March 2013.

I realize this WGLC comes right before the IETF; however, this document 
has been around for a long time, and it is my hope that this can be done 
expeditiously.

Regards,
Karen

Abstract: As time synchronization protocols are becoming increasingly 
common and widely deployed, concern about their exposure to various 
security threats is increasing. This document defines a set of security 
requirements for time synchronization protocols, focusing on the 
Precision Time Protocol (PTP) and the Network Time Protocol (NTP). This 
document also discusses the security impacts of time synchronization 
protocol practices, the time synchronization performance implications of 
external security practices, the dependencies between other security 
services and time synchronization.



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email