Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
dieter.sibold@ptb.de Tue, 26 February 2013 13:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dieter.sibold@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08721F87ED for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.623, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18TuvQLMdaAG for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (MX1.Berlin.PTB.De [194.94.94.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EC021F87E9 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DCEC1107A4; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tulpe.berlin.ptb.de (r00031.berlin.ptb.de [172.30.200.131]) by MX1.Berlin.PTB.De (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4361107A0; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de ([141.25.85.201]) by tulpe.berlin.ptb.de (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP3) with ESMTP id 2013022614390931-40104 ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org>
References: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org>
To: odonoghue@isoc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: C11C13CD:ACE7569A-C1257B1E:004AEFFE; type=4; flags=0; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3FP3 November 15, 2012
Message-ID: <OFC11C13CD.ACE7569A-ONC1257B1E.004AEFFE-C1257B1E.004AFE9C@ptb.de>
From: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:39:06 +0100
X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Serialize by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Serialize complete at 26.02.2013 14:39:08, Itemize by Notes Client on Dieter Sibold/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 26.02.2013 14:39:09, S/MIME Sign complete at 26.02.2013 14:39:09, Serialize by Router on ROSE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:08, Serialize complete at 02/26/2013 14:39:08, Itemize by SMTP Server on TULPE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:09, Serialize by Router on TULPE/PTB(Release 8.5.3FP3|November 15, 2012) at 02/26/2013 14:39:10, Serialize complete at 02/26/2013 14:39:10
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="-------z11844_boundary_sign"
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:39:14 -0000
I recommend advancing this document. Dieter ---------------------------------- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Q.42 - Server Administration Dr. Dieter Sibold Bundesallee 100 D-38116 Braunschweig Tel: +49-531-592-84 20 Mobile E-Mail: dieter.sibold@ptb.de Von: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> An: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, Datum: 25.02.2013 12:41 Betreff: [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements Gesendet von: ntpwg-bounces+dieter.sibold=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on advancing: Title : Security Requirements of Time Synchronization Protocols in Packet Switched Networks Author(s) : Tal Mizrahi Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-04.txt Pages : 32 Date : 2013-02-07 http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements/ as an Informational RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call will end on 12 March 2013. I realize this WGLC comes right before the IETF; however, this document has been around for a long time, and it is my hope that this can be done expeditiously. Regards, Karen Abstract: As time synchronization protocols are becoming increasingly common and widely deployed, concern about their exposure to various security threats is increasing. This document defines a set of security requirements for time synchronization protocols, focusing on the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) and the Network Time Protocol (NTP). This document also discusses the security impacts of time synchronization protocol practices, the time synchronization performance implications of external security practices, the dependencies between other security services and time synchronization. _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-securit… Karen O'Donoghue
- Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-sec… Kevin Gross
- Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-sec… Cuiyang
- Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-ti… dieter.sibold