[TICTOC] WG: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07.txt
kristof.teichel@ptb.de Thu, 05 March 2015 10:02 UTC
Return-Path: <kristof.teichel@ptb.de>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838641A038F for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:02:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.259
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQItWLCA74qR for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:02:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (mx1.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5015B1A017F for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 02:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.bs.ptb.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 053EAD6830D; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:02:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.bs.ptb.de (rose.bs.ptb.de [141.25.85.201]) by mx1.bs.ptb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6119D584D0; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:02:12 +0100 (CET)
To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, tictoc@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 671CCA03:41720793-C1257DFF:00366387; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013
Message-ID: <OF671CCA03.41720793-ONC1257DFF.00366387-C1257DFF.003721EE@ptb.de>
From: kristof.teichel@ptb.de
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 11:02:11 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ROSE/PTB(Release 9.0.1FP3HF79 | February 9, 2015) at 03/05/2015 11:02:12, Serialize complete at 03/05/2015 11:02:12
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003721EDC1257DFF_="
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/YSxMPqveYHFFuNlKKAXr0WNfaFM>
Subject: [TICTOC] WG: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07.txt
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 10:02:24 -0000
Hello everyone, I would like to alert you all again to our new version of the NTS draft, comments and questions would be welcome here or at the meeting in Dallas. Also, I would like to mention that there is one thing that we already stumbled upon, which was planned for this version but somehow forgotten: the next draft version will feature at least a few words on differentiating between public/private key pairs for encryption and signing, as at the moment this is left unclear. Best regards, Kristof ntpwg-bounces+kristof.teichel=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org schrieb am 03.03.2015 13:22:18: > Von: internet-drafts@ietf.org > An: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> > Kopie: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > Datum: 03.03.2015 13:24 > Betreff: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07.txt > Gesendet von: ntpwg-bounces+kristof.teichel=ptb.de@lists.ntp.org > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Network Time Protocol Working > Group of the IETF. > > Title : Network Time Security > Authors : Dieter Sibold > Stephen Roettger > Kristof Teichel > Filename : draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07.txt > Pages : 35 > Date : 2015-03-03 > > Abstract: > This document describes Network Time Security (NTS), a collection of > measures that enable secure time synchronization with time servers > using protocols like the Network Time Protocol (NTP) or the Precision > Time Protocol (PTP). Its design considers the special requirements > of precise timekeeping which are described in Security Requirements > of Time Protocols in Packet Switched Networks [RFC7384]. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ntp-network-time-security-07 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > ntpwg mailing list > ntpwg@lists.ntp.org > http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [TICTOC] WG: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-n… kristof.teichel
- Re: [TICTOC] WG: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-n… Richard Cochran