RE: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling
"STUART VENTERS" <stuart.venters@adtran.com> Mon, 19 March 2007 18:40 UTC
Return-path: <tictoc-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTMm8-00088C-9F; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:40:08 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTMm7-000887-Q8 for tictoc@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:40:07 -0400
Received: from p02c11o143.mxlogic.net ([208.65.144.76]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HTMlh-0002Hg-LB for tictoc@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:40:07 -0400
Received: from unknown [208.251.151.99] by p02c11o143.mxlogic.net (mxl_mta-4.0.2-2) with SMTP id de8def54.2177727408.329.00-029.p02c11o143.mxlogic.net (envelope-from <stuart.venters@adtran.com>); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:39:41 -0600 (MDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:39:27 -0500
Message-ID: <8F242B230AD6474C8E7815DE0B4982D703B800DF@EXV1.corp.adtran.com>
In-Reply-To: <OFCA4C81CB.0427152F-ON802572A3.005B602E-802572A3.005C3B22@semtech.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling
Thread-Index: AcdqRnnjkEr2WVeKTMWhtnP0z/wsrAAC6Tzg
From: STUART VENTERS <stuart.venters@adtran.com>
To: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Spam: [F=0.0100000000; S=0.010(2007030701)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <stuart.venters@adtran.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [208.251.151.99]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88
Cc: DTonks@semtech.com
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org
Dave, If an ensemble is a collection of separate reference clocks, then I can see your logic. If an ensemble is a collection of paths back to the same PRC, then it seems like if the noise goes up as you add paths, then there is something wrong with the combining algorithm, not the basic plan to combine clocks. Which sort of ensemble do you feel is more suitable for "carrier class" timing? (Also I wonder if the tradeoffs between providing a wander free frequency reference and a correct time of day reference are mixed into this.) Regards, Stuart -----Original Message----- From: DTonks@semtech.com [mailto:DTonks@semtech.com] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 11:48 AM To: tictoc@ietf.org Subject: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling Attending the WSTS07 last week, I was left with the impression that people considered one of the good things about NTP is the ability to form a clock from an ensemble of master clocks. However, I see this as another potentially serious source of noise which may swamp the output noise budget for many telecom applications. I can see that having an ensemble could offer good performance, but I think that would only be acheived if the ensemble was a stable collection. If master clocks can appear and disappear, then their individual biasses will pull the output phase around a little. For the generally-accepted accuracy of 1-10ms, this effect is probably not visible, but when the application requires +/-500ns accuracy then I think this problem will dominate. I am not an NTP expert, but I can imagine this problem is more difficult to solve than PDV-filtering. I would also like to know what the carriers think of this - do they consider this approach to be "carrier-class"? Dave Semtech Ltd Office address: 2-3 Park Court, Premier Way, Abbey Park Ind Est, Romsey, SO51 9DN Tel: +44 (0)1794 527600 Fax: +44 (0)1794 527601 Registered office: 4th Floor, Saltire Court, 20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, EH1 2EN Registered in Scotland 53259 VAT No. GB572685604 _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list TICTOC@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc _______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list TICTOC@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
- [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling DTonks
- RE: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling STUART VENTERS
- RE: [TICTOC] Re: TICTOC NTP ensembling DTonks