IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TICTOC] Questions (and one comment) on ietf-ptp

Alex Campbell <Alex.Campbell@Aviatnet.com> Tue, 03 April 2018 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Alex.Campbell@Aviatnet.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81550126E01 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uGUEkZdaNl0P for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-send.aviatnet.com (mail-send.aviatnet.com [192.147.115.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378891241FC for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alex Campbell <Alex.Campbell@Aviatnet.com>
To: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Questions (and one comment) on ietf-ptp
Thread-Index: AQHTy6EhthiHDWHAOkiDbnTRANKrCQ==
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 23:12:45 +0000
Message-ID: <1522797165709.26438@Aviatnet.com>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.15.6.9]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_152279716570926438Aviatnetcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/uitt3nS4DWo2OcWswelBjD5EQ80>
Subject: [TICTOC] Questions (and one comment) on ietf-ptp
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 23:12:48 -0000

Hi,


Regarding the YANG model defined in draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07:


When an arbitrary identifier is needed for a list key, most YANG models tend to use strings (e.g. ietf-hardware, ietf-interfaces, tend to use strings rather than numbers.
I suggest changing instance-number to a string instance-name.


Is there a way for the management system to determine the relationship between port numbers and interface names, when using transparent clock mode?
port-ds-list has underlying-interface, which seems to solve exactly this problem. But there's no such leaf for transparent-clock-port-ds-list.


Finally, what should happen if a port is configured as a member of more than one instance (or one instance and transparent clock)?


Thanks,
   Alex

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status