IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00

Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org> Thu, 07 April 2016 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stenn@stenn.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE09A12D56A for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id esF4RnzZYSlQ for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stenn.ntp.org (stenn.ntp.org [149.20.68.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 235FE12D555 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 23:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [::1] (helo=stenn.ntp.org) by stenn.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <stenn@stenn.ntp.org>) id 1ao3XO-00057A-Rw; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 06:35:30 +0000
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-reply-to: <20160407062137.2395D406074@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
References: <20160407062137.2395D406074@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> message dated "Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:21:37 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.6; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 24)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 06:35:30 +0000
Message-Id: <E1ao3XO-00057A-Rw@stenn.ntp.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/z0hLoZjl1HYxkNWTyE5qYJ9dpSA>
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>, tictoc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] [ntpwg] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 06:38:08 -0000

Hal Murray writes:
> 
> stenn@ntp.org said:
> > As I said before, the real source of time is available from a mode 6 query.
>  
> 
> My system doesn't automatically log that.  The remove system probably
> does log it, but I probably don't have convenient access to those log
> files.

How did you get from a mode 6 query to a log file?

> If the reason the remove server is hiding the real refid is to prevent
> the bad guys from figuring out which servers it is using, then mode 6
> access is probably blocked.

a) the "real refid" is not being hidden.  The express purpose of the
refid is maintained.

b) if you have a valid reason for issuing mode 6 queries and the "other
side" doesn't choose to allow this, that's their policy choice.  In that
case you can continue to use them for time, or not.  Your policy choice.

H

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status