Re: [Time] Fwd: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison to IETF on YANG Service OAM models"

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Sun, 14 September 2014 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: time@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: time@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B521A02EA for <time@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48TrTlP9Lsp4 for <time@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C50731A0140 for <time@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u57so3107580wes.36 for <time@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TxTn13lWuoxOrTKxc5GIYaLKjzgfoeTgYuN4oPDXq7c=; b=S6wspTYwLiGEVpOfLKdWmrnGOdSktZ/Rbjg0ZiWYukSpvUOYJajkaAYektTvF0QLnu qtupN/RwfrBASrCuFSVNqZZrW2vy5YgAqlxw4ddJw93he5Y/Xckz/j3UCc1OQOKP9gRY Z547mrY1w62icC0Ra3FRJkSCo9C7e7PlXH2nkm3N/DvYzLQNqyJg7A/xiQQw1glXNpup KHG/892dX6IPhOMTD3nX7FpBIiHyn4dV45JUDsa34+WXlqnhhBwivHuKQKoC7ZXQ74YH B2QX6pBERbQ9yj9SrGqLVcaXWZvYV+tjYiArida8vfGRdWMRPbHmUyJM3pZdv673u5Uh SCYA==
X-Received: by 10.180.75.144 with SMTP id c16mr18927527wiw.9.1410731200417; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from McAsterix.local (g215085.upc-g.chello.nl. [80.57.215.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u10sm9548702wix.2.2014.09.14.14.46.39 for <time@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54160CBE.4000508@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 23:46:38 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: time@ietf.org
References: <20140820200806.30600.80876.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <540D65BE.5010302@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA845C2BC6@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C89AD33@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C89AD33@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/time/HOYYRrcCvWCvaOhfqEzoSrXCsCc
Subject: Re: [Time] Fwd: New Liaison Statement, "Liaison to IETF on YANG Service OAM models"
X-BeenThere: time@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: "Transport Independent OAM in Multi-Layer network Entity \(TIME\) discussion list." <time.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/time>, <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/time/>
List-Post: <mailto:time@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/time>, <mailto:time-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:46:45 -0000

Hello Dan,

You write:

> My opinion is that the IETF should be involved in the development of
> data models (using YANG or other Data Modeling Languages) only when
> these model IETF technologies (for example routing protocols).

I agree. This should be starting point of the development.

> Data
> models (using YANG or other DMLs) that refer to technologies developed
> out of the IETF (like layer 2 protocols, or ITU-T OAM) should be
> developed by the respective organizations.

Indeed. And what we can do is ask other SDOs if they would like to
be involved in developing a generic DML.
Then they can also share their network objectives to develop such
a model.

> If Generic multi-layer OAM is defined by the IETF, a possible data model
> can be developed here.

Yes.

Regards, Huub.


-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住,你是独一无二的,就像其他每一个人一样