Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register value in TLS Exporter Labels registry

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 10 March 2022 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807F63A114A for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QnEw-_lWhre3 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C6E3A1B0A for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id r10so9408134wrp.3 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Lg1YGPpZh2bP5AckISpHdec+CTMlGFkGNI9t4ssn/Y8=; b=PcS9uVtdTNIvAMUI/gwxCvNn4bOrfOGBlZt84C45CPFQtLWLDepoi3TnL7TGwsCj1e UiX3JPsxG1hzgBwzh2CZNJgjKdTsA8VJAXb3VjHhhtdZmvbnVAsrgxVT0IsgoAr1Cpqk +6l6TITd8HPBstH5arEX24sJkw/VURSoJFg+LHGbDa66fZx6Mv7sT6pAZVg37TbNAEOz M/dE5BsHES5aHI2TBdLk8S0Gr4ruZif5imQGw0yhnU9AI27MxnLJMmZjct0TlElJwiGH rprd8e0nDVZoBSa5IxkIzdsDnS/2EORzW34Z+GyEfLpfzWAI+qrxfZM0yOH8KRcTagzc KROA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Lg1YGPpZh2bP5AckISpHdec+CTMlGFkGNI9t4ssn/Y8=; b=4EaDjaVsp/hZ62afZjSV74hfbP7UuzscVvFyVtaN9u+Skn49JgPilTjraWH0VcRPev ZA26ziNr8di/6XfCOgzR7xaiOvqyYtWcKL8fZgymssO9oJkt+5tAyvmOHfbI6yf6E/DC sSbPnOuSa6UB85loF3lP78JY5dmqeQgl+4+/nE8YUjlHq7pvLB1kCRX66odAMzslnPdX gaXvXfuX007hcvnmiQ+heCOWSJp21gbdYIBTMM7yvZ9A0s46pqcsNSxYTdZo8lKsSnLk GwfpgjRBJ4Lw3T81vQz/8VVt0sJDp50o1y/IRyXcZaqZ8ObDiwVd1p72QTFMmnpaP2gk HJ/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BYxOl7AHEk/Dfmb3se6JSBsomrsyR2ieN2iPdqMfNYjXdVSz0 6D1NDp0oZMJBx+DQbKdLkzw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXo0Pz8C6OQPQWDVCRfK6qmVyKpYqNEsy6Rnusf9bBKGpzG2HAmS2KjxxLBK8hWi3ovdWHsA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1561:b0:203:7b90:1da0 with SMTP id 1-20020a056000156100b002037b901da0mr4660623wrz.629.1646937522501; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (84.94.37.215.cable.012.net.il. [84.94.37.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2-20020a056000184200b002037b40de23sm4377213wri.8.2022.03.10.10.38.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Mar 2022 10:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <075bd958-72e8-0e5d-37cb-38d3feb5998e@att.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:38:39 +0200
Cc: "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>, nick@cloudflare.com, "wlupton@broadband-forum.org" <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <812D0C5B-E639-4571-97D0-1955828CC39D@gmail.com>
References: <4cd15014-d8b0-3f7e-3366-17d2ef852805.ref@att.net> <4cd15014-d8b0-3f7e-3366-17d2ef852805@att.net> <1C6B5BAF-2E0C-4155-840B-CB164A93DCAA@akamai.com> <1d02ac4d-a45e-3aa4-6f59-c909c5fa2d39@att.net> <3CA936F2-ACC8-4853-AE38-FA3103961D89@akamai.com> <075bd958-72e8-0e5d-37cb-38d3feb5998e@att.net>
To: Barbara Stark <barbara-stark@att.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/8aIDRQmio5YtOcj3uZoU6fO-Mzo>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register value in TLS Exporter Labels registry
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 18:38:50 -0000

Yes. I approve too.

> On 9 Mar 2022, at 17:58, Barbara Stark <barbara-stark@att.net> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Rich.
> 
> Yoav or Nick, do either of you approve?
> 
> We have the published specification and the correct label syntax. As mentioned before, this BBF device management protocol (called USP) is using TLS *inside* a USP Record to encrypt the payload USP Message. The Exporter Label is used to set up this TLS-encrypted session inside the USP Record.
> 
> Thx,
> 
> Barbara
> 
> On 3/7/2022 12:16 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>> I approve.  Still need an approval from Nick and/or Yoav.
>> 
>> Please excuse the mangled URL's. :(
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/7/22, 1:12 PM, "Barbara Stark" <barbara-stark@att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>     Based on this preliminary judgment, BBF has published its specification
>>     that describes use of the TLS Exporter Label "EXPORTER-BBF-USP-Record".
>>     BBF would like to get this value placed in the IANA TLS Exporter Labels
>>     registry
>>     (https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xml#exporter-labels).
>> 
>> 
>>     The registry entry values are unchanged from the preliminary request and
>>     are:
>> 
>>          Value: EXPORTER-BBF-USP-Record
>> 
>>          DTLS-OK: N
>> 
>>          Recommended: N
>> 
>>          Reference: [TR-369](https://usp.technology/specification)
>> 
>>     The specific section in the referenced specification where use of this
>>     TLS Exporter Label is described is:
>> 
>>     https://usp.technology/specification/06-index-e2e-message-exchange.html#sec:using-tls-to-validate-the-integrity-of-usp-records
>> 
>>     Thx,
>> 
>>     Barbara (requesting for BBF, unaffiliated)
>> 
>>     On 12/10/2021 9:12 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>     > I skimmed the page you mentioned in the draft.  There should be no problems adding the value you want.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > On 12/9/21, 4:03 PM, "Barbara Stark" <barbara-stark@att.net> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >      Hi all,
>>     >
>>     >      Broadband Forum would like to register the following in the TLS Exporter
>>     >      Labels registry:
>>     >
>>     >      Value: EXPORTER-BBF-USP-Record
>>     >
>>     >      DTLS-OK: N
>>     >
>>     >      Recommended: N
>>     >
>>     >      Reference: [TR-369](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://usp.technology/specification__;!!GjvTz_vk!CM7TlnempevJ3ASyL8QVQw9FwHcnT6K5b--fg_DfAy05ULn98NTXZQNgwu4c$ )
>>     >
>>     >      However, the updated specification with a reference to the Exporter
>>     >      Label is not yet published at that location. It is currently undergoing
>>     >      final review. But before we can approve for publication, we need to know
>>     >      that there will be no problem with adding this registry value. We are
>>     >      fine if adding it to the registry is delayed until the spec is fully
>>     >      published, or if the registry entry is added pointing to the draft and
>>     >      subsequently updated to point to the published version 1.2 of the
>>     >      specification.
>>     >
>>     >      The draft (under final review) version of the specification is currently at:
>>     >
>>     >      https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/BroadbandForum/usp/blob/master/resources/wt-369-1-2-draft1.pdf__;!!GjvTz_vk!CM7TlnempevJ3ASyL8QVQw9FwHcnT6K5b--fg_DfAy05ULn98NTXZc5eKxxo$
>>     >
>>     >      The reference to EXPORTER-BBF-USP-Record is in section 6.3.2 (page 82)
>>     >      of this draft PDF. In TR-369 (which defines a protocol named "USP"), TLS
>>     >      can be used *inside* a USP Record to encrypt the payload USP Message.
>>     >      The Exporter Label is used to set up this TLS-encrypted session inside
>>     >      the USP Record.
>>     >
>>     >      Thx,
>>     >
>>     >      Barbara
>>     >
>>     >      Barbara Stark (requesting for BBF)
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >      _______________________________________________
>>     >      tls-reg-review mailing list
>>     >      tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>>     >      https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review__;!!GjvTz_vk!F-9xRrEzj9rduUkD3mpfH4Sp-KYhFThgALPK81XDDs7D5hs4Cwczy1vb6hPG$
>>     >
>> 
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     tls-reg-review mailing list
>>     tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review__;!!GjvTz_vk!CM7TlnempevJ3ASyL8QVQw9FwHcnT6K5b--fg_DfAy05ULn98NTXZepCDcB-$
>>