[Tls-reg-review] Request to register value in TLS Certificate Types

Mounira Msahli <mounira.msahli@telecom-paristech.fr> Wed, 07 November 2018 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <msahli@enst.fr>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB27127148 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:20:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.973, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telecom-paristech.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55qpDnpsYtC0 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr (zproxy110.enst.fr [137.194.2.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F950126CB6 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36A28185E; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id LvfnTT6gDQ3N; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E2B81930; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy110.enst.fr 64E2B81930
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telecom-paristech.fr; s=A6AEC2EE-1106-11E5-B10E-D103FDDA8F2E; t=1541564414; bh=5lyG2oxNnc8c2RAMqXTDLLjlD+xIUTa+Hd8lGJij8dY=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=diLl5v+61g6DhzfE9MOIwbe52LUQjJTMJKbYnQEVUt93G3i+K0ya9OAiiiDYINrvI tTawuoTJRaxrbVbwZh6rUKhvDIEDbEp3gOipaaFbURjvF7/EBX0VBpcfiX9CGjVhyh 2aCw31PAVh88/rvzr/eUliHg3gJeVJJAm1jLON0E=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy110.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy110.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy110.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id dMBhdZbhqVyE; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zmail112.enst.fr (zmail112.enst.fr [137.194.2.205]) by zproxy110.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AF78185E; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 05:20:14 +0100
From: Mounira Msahli <mounira.msahli@telecom-paristech.fr>
To: tls-reg-review@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Message-ID: <1381927978.17451230.1541564414183.JavaMail.zimbra@enst.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [::ffff:110.170.235.6]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.9_GA_3019 (ZimbraWebClient - IE17.17134 (Win)/8.8.9_GA_3019)
Thread-Index: wc0U23S6LQeTF8bXrJuWEyjYjyD6gw==
Thread-Topic: Request to register value in TLS Certificate Types
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/mu0Zg0wQT93fueW2qII9TSIat-A>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] Request to register value in TLS Certificate Types
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 04:20:18 -0000

Dear Sir, 


We would like to reserve one value for new certificates types to extend TLS protocol. In fact, we already published an IETF draft : 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tls-certieee1609-02
We describe the extension of TLS to support one new certificate type:IEEE/ETSI certificate. 
We would like to assign the value 3 for IEEE/ETSI certificate. 
Our assignment concerns Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions and specially TLS Certificate Types. 

Best regards 
Mounira MSAHLI