Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1113784] General Request for Assignment (tls-extensiontype-values)

Hi, Amanda.

I haven’t seen the original email, and can’t find it in my inbox.

Anyway, the assignments seem fine to me.

Rich?  Nick?

Yoav

> On 23 Jun 2018, at 3:17, Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Our understanding is that the review period for TLS requests is three weeks:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-05#section-18
> 
> I can confirm that the message below was received by the mailing list.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Fri Jun 22 20:41:55 2018, mbishop@evequefou.be wrote:
>> I haven't seen any follow-up e-mails regarding this.  Is there any
>> other information required in order to add this registration?  For
>> additional reference, https://github.com/w3c/resource-
>> timing/issues/122 and
>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=780640#c6 are
>> the issues where this gap in the registry is causing questions.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Amanda Baber via RT [mailto:iana-prot-param@iana.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 2:33 PM
>> To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
>> Subject: [IANA #1113784] General Request for Assignment (tls-
>> extensiontype-values_
>> 
>> Dear Mike,
>> 
>> Thank you for contacting us. We've sent this on to the new team of
>> IESG-designated experts. The Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation
>> (ALPN) Protocol IDs registry will be updated soon to include a link to
>> recently-approved document draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates, which
>> provides new instructions for submitting registration requests for
>> some of the TLS registries. Specifically, in the future, new requests
>> should be sent to a mailing list (rather than IANA) for a three-week
>> review period. The experts will then contact us if they approve a
>> registration.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Amanda Baber
>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>> 
>> On Thu Jun 14 17:27:37 2018, mbishop@evequefou.be wrote:
>>> 
>>> Contact Name:
>>> Mike Bishop
>>> 
>>> Contact Email:
>>> mbishop@evequefou.be
>>> 
>>> Type of Assignment:
>>> Registration of "http/0.9" and "http/1.0" tokens (both protocols are
>>> defined by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1945)
>>> 
>>> Registry:
>>> Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) Protocol ID
>>> 
>>> Description:
>>> These legacy protocols are used in testing and by older server
>>> implementations and these tokens are already used in certain cases.
>>> The W3C resource-timing specification uses the ALPN registry as a
>>> reference for possible protocol values, and there has been some
>>> confusion caused by the fact that these tokens aren't actually
>>> registered.
>>> 
>>> It would simplify the community's life if these tokens, already in de
>>> facto use, were actually registered and had an appropriate
>>> specification reference.
>>> 
>>> Additional Info:
>>> http://www.iana.org/go/rfc7301
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tls-reg-review mailing list
> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review

Re: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1113784] General Request for Assignment (tls-extensiontype-values)

Attachment: signature.asc