[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1184037] expert review for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests (tls-extensiontype-values)

Hi Rich,

I see your suggestion to use 40.  Should we make these registrations now or wait until the document gets approved?

It's on the IESG telechat agenda for 17 December 2020.

Thanks in advance.

--Michelle

On Thu Dec 03 16:22:44 2020, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> Looks good to me.
> 
> Use 40, fill in the hole :)
> 
> 
> On 12/2/20, 4:49 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-expert-review-
> comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,
> 
> Can you review the proposed TLS ExtensionType Value registration in
> this document for us?
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-
> ietf-tls-ticketrequests/__;!!GjvTz_vk!BT4ypRkWdQTeskqmRgq3lDoNbJ-
> a9FFV9C5ki7pDDlyC7H5TuYp2eG_Z0aRz$
> 
> We understand that the registration would look like this:
> 
> Value: [ TBD-at-Registration ]
> Extension Name: ticket_request
> TLS 1.3: CH, EE
> Recommended: Y
> Reference: [ RFC-ietf-tls-ticketrequests ]
> 
> If this is approved, should we make the registration now instead of
> waiting for the IESG to approve the document? If so, should we assign
> value 40, 46, 54, or 57?
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-
> extensiontype-values__;!!GjvTz_vk!BT4ypRkWdQTeskqmRgq3lDoNbJ-
> a9FFV9C5ki7pDDlyC7H5TuYp2eErgVb7b$
> 
> Please respond by December 16th.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tls-reg-review mailing list
> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
>  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-
> reg-review__;!!GjvTz_vk!BT4ypRkWdQTeskqmRgq3lDoNbJ-
> a9FFV9C5ki7pDDlyC7H5TuYp2eOs3M-ue$
> 