IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] [Emu] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-14.txt

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795E73A0B63; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:48:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKs_ozLv2Nsu; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:47:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54333A0B83; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:47:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.46.129] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20A18D97; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:47:55 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <8BF8E43F-A46A-4456-9324-8EC1414115E0@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:47:54 -0500
Cc: "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>, "TLS@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <960C0296-DE93-4648-BD0E-1186F40C6D37@deployingradius.com>
References: <161228330895.7253.17825433667922662110@ietfa.amsl.com> <8BF8E43F-A46A-4456-9324-8EC1414115E0@ericsson.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/0HjWiLOdJiflgVXQmmBbyTC-wqE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Emu] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-14.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:48:01 -0000

On Feb 2, 2021, at 11:31 AM, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Our understanding is that draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13 currently has no possibility to progress to the RFC editor’s que. To secure a place in the RFC editors’ que we have submitted version -14 that addresses all the comments in the IESG Discuss. -14 uses close_notify instead of a application data commitment message and slightly changes the exporter calls. We hope this version will clear the remaining Discuss. The only way forward at the moment is to publish and implement -14.

  The way forward is to resolve open issues.  Publishing the current draft would be premature.

> Implementors have expressed a preference for draft-13, but an even stronger preference to finalize and publish the draft. I hope the discussions will continue during the coming weeks and at the EMU WG meeting at IETF 110 meeting, but -14 looks like the only thing that can reach agreement to be published at this point.

  IMHO we are still nowhere near agreement.  There are many open questions which have not been resolved.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email