IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] SAAG TLS working group report

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 20 July 2017 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E48131A86 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Gqbg4TaDrgm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4F7129AD1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 03:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA66CBE39; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:42:05 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnPNPM5o12MR; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:42:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [31.133.132.197] (dhcp-84c5.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.132.197]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31CC2BE2D; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:42:04 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1500547324; bh=W9UWHfQD+Lm2NG3NND5oFCwwja2apA8CZPBub0b5aKI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=4fWotjAAS2X8eGsp8y6u/BCxdr+CV3PC7BKi7kBzs/Jf6lwcoZ4MCBj7nCBWmR9aK +C+hpkuf/zH/R+Oc62iyQZOvWfThitKQFnUgRLsgsJSUMbwRu5BRysUYxKtlMGpRPp qDETdErEiXbBOHIlbf//ysasFqdfEs+2jpQr+/iE=
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <CAOgPGoCC7Lfr8ueQP36bnDoLSh5NXoQ1Vdii7H14SMpJULm=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <e696f230-1520-8c21-1e79-ab7e0a81b6a2@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:42:03 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoCC7Lfr8ueQP36bnDoLSh5NXoQ1Vdii7H14SMpJULm=Rw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LIbv2jFQF8Ix3l879wV2xJOdAaECN0IlL"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/2y5xFuPne-l9u5Ny8H9tmOOSVgU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SAAG TLS working group report
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:42:09 -0000

Hi Joe,

On 20/07/17 09:54, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> We had presentations on the pros and cons of a  proposed mechanism
> to decrypt TLS messages within the data center.   A hum indicated that
> there was roughly equal support on both sides.  Therefore, well will
> continue the discussion and it is unlikely that the draft will proceed in
> its current form.

Thanks for that. Having chatted with Russ also, it seems like
I ought change the tinfoil repo from describing draft-green as
a current proposal to one of our long list of failed proposals.
If that's right, that's good IMO.

I guess I'll leave a watch-this-space marker in "current proposals"
for the next one;-(

Cheers,
S.



> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email