Re: [TLS] WG adoption call for draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc

I'm OK with adoption.  

That said, I believe that this falls a long way short of addressing the attacks that I'm aware of.  But that assumes we share an understanding about what those attacks are.  To begin with, we probably need a clearer description of goals.  

To give an idea, address validation in QUIC is much more complex than is proposed here, for reasons I believe to be good.  If this document does less than QUIC, it needs to justify that.

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020, at 04:55, Sean Turner wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The authors of "Return Routability Check for DTLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.3" 
> have asked for adoption of their draft as a WG item.  Please state 
> whether you support adoption of this draft as a WG item by posting a 
> message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 06 August 2020.  Please include any 
> additional information that is helpful in understanding your position.
> 
> NOTE:
> We discussed this draft at IETF 105 in connection with 
> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id [0]. The plan at the time was to 
> progress draft-tschofenig-tls-dtls-rrc after we progressed 
> draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id. That time is now.
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris, Joe, and Sean
> 
> [0] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-tls-sessb-cid-00
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>