Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-35

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B7F3A0C7A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bHXzL9TqoXR for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0982F3A1411 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id q9so1606272lfc.10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sqZd6r/yqupeqOb55mZ9B1w1L7RHpR/tayuw55FdNd0=; b=muLuavm5BW6JHVjTqx2/etbHOy5vj/IjkZzR6QBL23yexd6SM3QAVzcTPIv76kFU0E VcFZ7G19c64Pk2NpJEBkHuOyJhaAdWkS8QIOTxRLSpeOxxIL8xNuXHPQr1RZo/kNu3yo G9UIoyLl+BBAim/r4FrmuKvwSaB57Rxzlt969HL+/6nbmpdAiituLoX/MA3Yrqk0mbk3 YMFqSDzqLB9bygK+93GtxSKp+nfjAcfbBt+YziPn9id/QUFWenCjjwwRuTrt5XjJ0Ltm AicxxKXYCGpn4ScoxMbPnngZSiYtYCMlltVHTKrwFVs0vv7Lyt/wLIY3JYrOevgu+llG kCkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=sqZd6r/yqupeqOb55mZ9B1w1L7RHpR/tayuw55FdNd0=; b=kgmTWqxSpZreEsUexHuyxQdlASjF40AAxh8lv27R0RiqDNU20Xci4L8l11VWkoJDs8 eeH/MjFTwHi1oY7y9YOaenHkm7v5g4aSYWP8jNrNzRaRJ2IuTyyotiIBR4QZR+U7RlfH 38BaAaPu+6jwHKV3TpZhGJYOH3gjGDQEdVkToSUmBiU2Qxx5qAjFTvt+/xYM+vAv7k7L sEZIt4os0irGyBaWkXQWMn2YOi9jDqNS04Iluirxn2L7nLPCNjBtGGBWZqNrNZx8Syn9 /kp2hgTyk/mKAIYK/+58nI+Cx8yXt140BC5r1OMp7zSa+67n9yTN5Q2v4HSAXukijBTj aaYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1kebvXdU7RPerzF5oQvFUayMibMFCfgqmuRjhbPnIhkjL7CLk+ UcX1wiyC4kt73shvhb/VSFgc5TNnLTmGVfxg/IdyS1XKzSg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvnAliirlYpN+le0IMA8EM8l80tdXln10J1fQ3V9gp0pIlZSWZPQaRZiZGWUdhTQipqTpB46uKcRlXFt6mHAUM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e5:: with SMTP id n5mr9937568lfq.55.1583771827031; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABcZeBPv+y60P85PFf_b+Q+QzCdbJRz1D7FyRAq0foyk1gayBw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPv+y60P85PFf_b+Q+QzCdbJRz1D7FyRAq0foyk1gayBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 09:36:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNbp=kczG4bQCqd8LHbByPxz6Ur==E-Jmv6arP=14_TFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027e45905a06e9da7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/5Sn3hmGVypI87SGWgjD_aTBZO0I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-35
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:37:12 -0000

And -36 is now out, with some more editorial changes and changing the ACK
code point to avoid collisions.

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 2:24 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I have just submitted -35.
>
> This makes the following notable changes:
>
> - Fix contradictory text around the legacy cookie field by requiring it to
> be empty.
> - Note that you can't ACK records unless you are processing the contents
> (as noted by Hanno).
>
> It also fixes a few editorial problems around the AAD and the figures.
>
> -Ekr
>
>