Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state?
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 07:23 UTC
Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D011A015E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuymlBce4yC1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1041A014C for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 00:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3S7NJE0021531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:23:19 -0400
Received: from [10.34.2.127] (dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com [10.34.2.127]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3S7NH4P007657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Apr 2014 03:23:18 -0400
Message-ID: <1398669797.2453.6.camel@dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:23:17 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C35E915@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120C35E915@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6Kego9gQoTApz0BXFeCQr8J6HEk
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:23:23 -0000
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 09:27 -0400, Salz, Rich wrote: > What’s the current state of the Cha-Cha/Poly document? Do things need > changing, identifiers assigned, or what? We have submitted our proposal [0] based on the new chacha construction. It is up to the chairs to ask for WG adoption. [0]. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mavrogiannopoulos-chacha-tls-02 regards, Nikos
- [TLS] chacha/poly state? Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state? Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state? Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state? Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] chacha/poly state? Yoav Nir